• @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      521 year ago

      People who keep trying to do Socialism in a Capitalist system are doomed to fail, because Socialism produces enormous surpluses and Capitalists love to just gobble that shit up.

      • @Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        911 year ago

        “If peoples basic needs were met nobody would work!”

        People “work” all the time of their own accord, we just call it volunteering instead of “work.” People love saying “I don’t want to work,” but really what they mean is “I don’t want my economic output stolen from me by my employer while what’s left is stolen by ever increasing prices with no wage adjustment to compensate.”

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          471 year ago

          People “work” all the time of their own accord, we just call it volunteering instead of “work.”

          Never even mind volunteering. $50B/year in wage theft in this country. People contract to do labor and then their bosses simply short them. Back in 2019 a coal company attempted to close a mine without paying over $1M in back wages. The workers shut down the rail out of the money and seized the coal until they were made whole.

          Wish more folks who got fleeced by DuoLingo had the gumption to do something similar.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          That depends heavily on how the family operates.

          Historically speaking, the male head-of-household had dictatorial control over the ownership and expenditures within the household. Only in the last two generations have western women gained the right to hold down jobs and assume credit for large purchases, to own their own homes, and to take full custody of their children. The idea of emancipated minors, civil rights for children, and labor protections for young people are even newer. And there are plenty of reactionary political attitudes in the country that would see these reforms rolled back.

          A family certainly can operate in a socialist capacity, when productive property and its surplus is shared equitably. But there are plenty of instances in which the head-of-house is functionally no different than a landlord, demanding the rest of the family live contribute surplus labor while existing in relative poverty.

    • Joe Cool
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Make sure to put anything you want public under the correct license. If a platform doesn’t support CC or GPL or MIT, then leave.

      EDIT: Or Apache, or IDGAF, of course. ;) But what I would really want is a license that forces your content to remain free, even if used in something else. Basically copyleft: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.html

    • @Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      This baffles me. We’ve seen time and time again that for-profit will fuck you over any chance they get over a dollar if they must, and people still volunteers for them.

    • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 year ago

      And yet I am sure everyone reading this comment will leave a rideshare driver review this year or answer a question from Google maps or post information on Faceboot. A policy doesn’t mean much if it isn’t possible to enforce in a consistent manner.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah dude, leaving a review for a gig worker is totally the same thing as volunteering for a for-profit corporations.