• @EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You ask a leading question and I rightfully dismissed it with a question that exposed what a joke it is. The reality is that you can’t explain how understanding the constitution is apologizing for anyone, so you have to whine about the rhetorical device used to expose the glaring logical flaw in your “argument.”

      • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        You could have just said “well understanding the cotus is not apologizing for anyone” and this would have been a much shorter and reasonable conversation.

        • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          You harp on and on about understanding the constitution but only illustrate ignorance. Also, you’re getting your threads mixed up idiot.

          Are you just perpetually lost, that’s why we all get the same “BUT BUT COTUS” argument that doesn’t actually refer to any parts of the constitution or cite any relevant passages?

          BUT BUT COTUS

          Get fucked gaslighter. It was insurrection, stop crying and move on.

          • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I agree it was an insurrection. Lol

            Just because I think people did something wrong doesn’t mean I have to believe every little thing bad said about them. I know, this is a very hard concept for you to grasp and makes being constantly outraged and angry much more difficult, but I highly recommend trying to remain rational.