I considered deleting the post, but this seems more cowardly than just admitting I was wrong. But TIL something!

  • @Bender_on_Fire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    711 months ago

    I think quite some people heard of the concept of different kinds of infinity, but don’t know much about how these are defined. That’s why this meme should be inverted, as thinking the infinities described here are the same size is the intuitive answer when you either know nothing or quite something about the definition whereas knowing just a little bit can easily lead you to the wrong answer.

    As the described in the wikipedia article in the top level comment, the thing that matters is whether you can construct a mapping (or more precisely, a bijection) from one set to the other. If so, the sets/infinities are of the same “size”.

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Yeah, inverting it is a good idea, truly