They keep raising prices, stating that it’s due to inflation, but then they keep having record profits.

Meanwhile, the average American can barely afford rent or food nowadays.

What are we to do? Vote? I have been but that doesn’t seem to do much since I’m just voting for a representative that makes the actual decisions.

  • @deezbutts@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I feel like I also hear that we have a ton of homelessness despite lots of vacant homes, where can I learn more about the nuance of this?

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is specifically about Australia, but essentially all 3 parts of this piece (and related linked essays) sum up how to solve the housing crisis worldwide.

      https://theemergentcity.substack.com/p/how-to-solve-housing-unaffordability

      Boils down to:

      1: change zoning laws to allow more multifamily construction

      2: remove incentives for homeownership and generally disincentivize single family homes

      3: build for density in ways that reinforce and support density

      If you want more info, basically every mainstream economist in the world agrees this is the solution, and that this is a manufactured problem. It’s a result of regulatory capture by homeowners, essentially. There are many, many papers about it.

      Here’s an easily-digestible article

      https://www.businessinsider.com/economist-how-to-fix-america-housing-crisis-rural-cities-2022-10

      And a well-cited study in an economic journal:

      https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2022/12/30/the-economics-of-the-housing-shortage/

      All these sources agree, because this is the solution. Realistically, the only bad solutions are subsidizing more demand via things like rent control - these will only make our problems worse, kind of like how adding more lanes to a highway doesn’t fix traffic.

      • 1: change zoning laws to allow more multifamily construction

        Our city did this and it hasn’t helped at all, because banks won’t finance it. No minimum parking, no height limit, no maximum FAR, no maximum unit count.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No minimum parking, no height limit, no maximum FAR, no maximum unit count.

          yeah get rid of these next and you’re set.

          It’s gonna take a lot of work, man. The regulatory capture here is extreme.

          Everyone wants to point to capitalism for this, but this is what happens when you kneecap any economic system. That’s why it’s all over the world.

          • @TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s what I’m saying though, we got rid of those regulations, and it still doesn’t matter. Banks want parking. Banks limit height. Banks limit unit counts. Developers routinely propose some pretty decent housing products, where they’ve run the numbers and they work, then go to get it financed and it very rapidly gets cut in half and turned to shit.

            The only solution is for the city to finance and build themselves.

    • @Lemmygizer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      SUPER high level, and slightly biased explanation: corporate home buying.

      Large investment firms like buying up property increasing the demand and raising prices. This prices normal people out of being able to afford a house. It also raises other housing related costs like rent, because these firms want to make a profit. This in turn prices people out of being able to afford ANY housing.

      When we’re just numbers on a spreadsheet, there is a certain level of vacancy and homelessness, that maximizes profits.