MrSebSinM to Cyanide and Happiness@lemm.ee • 11 months ago3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1542arrow-down112
arrow-up1530arrow-down1image3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksMrSebSinM to Cyanide and Happiness@lemm.ee • 11 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilink51•edit-211 months agoI mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
minus-squareVindictiveJudgelinkfedilink19•11 months ago “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
minus-square@can@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink4•11 months agoAnd some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.
I mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to
“It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.”
The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism
All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
I always heard it was fern gully remake.
And some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.