• I tried. I finally wanted to switch away from Windows and installed mint. Spent about 3 hours trying to get my headphone jacks to work with some mildly obscure tools and commands but no dice. Then I managed to destroy one of my partitions by trying to Mount it but it gave me an obscure error. Searched the forums and found NTFS fix, well turns out I accidentally had turned the partition dynamic when moving it to a larger drive. NTFS fix didn’t like that and promptly destroyed the file table. I lost a buch of data. So back to the cruddy Windows then…I’m not tech savvy enough, which is sad.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        311 year ago

        If you’ve never, ever used Linux before and are not confident about its tools, it’s almost always better to use a fresh machine. NTFS and Linux really don’t mix well, for example.

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            It’s been a few years since I used Mint, but I enjoyed it. Most of the Debian-based distros are very similar, actually. All are decent for beginners. If not Mint, Pop is another good option.

              • circuitfarmer
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                I installed Zorin on my wife’s (=no prior Linux experience) laptop something like 2 years ago. Considering the fact that she still uses it almost daily, I’d say you’re right.

                Personally, I dislike some of the custom stuff it has over the more standard desktop environments, but I do think it’s great for usability in that it feels Windows-adjacent.

            • I did that prior and decided I like it, so I did a proper install. I just didn’t try the sound jacks and didn’t notice one of my drives not mounting.

        • Yes, all the important stuff was backed up naturally. Still lost some, I’d say “nostalgic old files” It just happens when you have large drives you can’t just back it up without paying lots.

    • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      mint will be stuck on xorg for the foreseeable future.

      if you want something with similar workflow to windows, KDE distros are pretty good nowadays.

      • @jaeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        mint will be stuck on xorg for the foreseeable future.

        Mint will use xorg as the default session until 2026, where it is projected that wayland will solve most if not all of its showstoppers.

        Mint’s cinnamon DE is built off of Mutter, GNOME’s compositor, so all it means is that Mint will be doing the same thing that it has always done, been what GNOME could have been if it hadn’t reinvented itself.

        Mint is a workflow extremely similar to what most users have experienced on Windows and specifically caters to Windows users or users coming from proprietary operating systems.

        • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          2026 is a hell of a wait though considering new drivers and software will start targeting wayland in that time.

          • @jaeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It is, but Mint has always prided itself on adopting new technology late once all the dust has settled. Besides, it’s just for Wayland being the default (and most likely deprecating the X11 session), a usable wayland session for cinnamon will most likely be available come 2025.

            There’s always POP!_OS going in hot with their COSMIC compositor, so people who want to adopt wayland can do so when POP!_OS does and still have that “Ubuntu™ experience minus Canonical” distro.

            If you want to see a hell of a wait, you should check out RHEL’s deprecation timeline.

      • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why does it matter? What user really cares if it’s Wayland or x11? Software is about solving problems for the user. Mint is far superior to Windows.

        Sent from KDE with x11…

        • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          because its unmantained and will not get new features anymore, i dont expect new software and hardware to support it going forward.

          sent from gnome and x11!

          • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            It doesn’t need new features and I’m pretty sure any bugs, vulnerabilities will still get ironed out. We both know Wayland will kill x11. The point is, considering we are both using x11, why should a new person from Windows need it now?

            In a few years, my position would be different, but for now, mileage varies and many face use cases it doesn’t yet cover. X11 is mature and mostly just works.

            • @Salix@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The point is, considering we are both using x11, why should a new person from Windows need it now?

              Depends on their hardware. I use 4 monitors at:

              • 1440p 165hz (FreeSync)
              • 1440p 75hz
              • 1440p 75hz
              • 4k 60hz

              It works better on Wayland. Other users could be in a similar situation.

              iirc, you can’t use FreeSync with multi monitors on Xorg as well

            • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              because its dying soon, no need to go all in on it now.

              neither of us will be using it. its already dead if your hardware doesnt include nvidia.

              • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                No one is going all in, and once distros retire it, it’s dead. Jumping before distros because you have a rush of blood to the head isn’t particularly helpful.

                My hardware has no Nvidia, but getting screen recording on Wayland was a royal pain in the backside. Functionally, x11 just works better for me right now. When they iron this stuff out and make it effortless, great, but until then, the software still needs maturing.

                • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  my point is that this kind of issue will be ironed out anyway and its looking like its gonna be sooner rather than later.

                  i dont mind if you are already invested in using xorg and its working out for you (hey, i do too). i just dont see much reason to go into linux for the first time as a noob with it in mind at all.

                  • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They don’t need to think about display servers. Just update and it will resolve itself. You’re overcomplicating things and scaring people away from Linux.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        To me mint was always the closest to what I wanted as a Windows user. I still user windows most of the time now but whenever I use Linux, it’s mint.

    • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      My last attempt to get games working on Linux did not go well, but I am hopeful the kinks will be sorted out by the time Win10 starts getting dropped.

      • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I game exclusively on Linux these days. I haven’t had an issue that I couldn’t solve so far aside from shitty anti cheat software that doesn’t play nice.

        I play single player almost exclusively, so that isn’t much of a problem for me.

        • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I think my hardware might have had something to do with it, was trying on a somewhat older laptop. Most games would not launch even with Proton and even most Linux native games did not work even after a fair bit of troubleshooting. I get that some people might not have problems but I believe problems still remain widespread.

          • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Oh yeah, definitely.

            Still, I think you should try with better hardware when you can.

            Any differences will not be significant.

            Get a Steam deck. Holy hell I love mine.

            • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’d rather not have to upgrade hardware that can run the games I want to play perfectly fine, hoping for improved support (or at the very least a straightforward way to tell specifically what the problem is). Though once Win10 ends it’s not like there’s going to be an alternative to Linux anyway since Win11 has strict requirements for new stuff.

      • Gunpachi
        link
        271 year ago

        Well both are good choices, but for new linux users coming from windows - Mint would be way easier to get started with.

          • folkrav
            link
            fedilink
            171 year ago
            • Alma/Rocky - I wouldn’t particularly push fresh converts to RHEL/CentOS based distros, but maybe that’s just me…
            • Debian - sure… given they can figure out the slightly less intuitive installer and non-free stuff
            • Ubuntu - Canonical has been making some weird decisions lately. With them dropping Unity, then Mir… I wouldn’t bet on snaps while the rest of the world settled on flatpak
              • folkrav
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Would you wish SELinux on a beginner tho

                Jesting apart, it’s admittedly a solid option. Sticking to a mainstream distro is typically what I recommend, regardless of which one. Most of the debates surrounding distros are pretty silly to begin with, IMHO, considering most differences boil down to which package manager and init system they use, and their set of default software and configurations.

          • DarkThoughts
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            Debian is just old unless you go into the unstable branches, and I don’t use that as an insult because Debian is obviously supposed to be stable. I have literally never heard of Alma or Rocky, and Ubuntu is just shit and has Snap as well as a very unfamiliar desktop layout. Cinnamon or KDE will be much better entries for people coming from Windows.

            Arch is of course just a stupid suggestion for Linux newbies and I honestly can’t take people like you serious for doing so unironically.

            • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              I agree that arch is stupid for newbies. I was taking a poke at mint. I would never suggest that.

              Alma/Rocky is what CentOS used to be.

              You can install KDE on Ubuntu, but point taken on KDE (I’m not familiar with cinnamon).

              I suggested basically RHEL and Debian because, like you said they are stable and relatively easy to install.

              Snap is rather new to me as well. I have a recent LTS install of Ubuntu and I don’t use it. I doubt someone who’s new into Linux will touch it.

              My other big concern is systemd. If you’re not familiar with Linux, systemd is a nightmare when things go wrong. But, I suppose a newbie won’t care

              • DarkThoughts
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                GRUB was a nightmare for me when things went wrong (EndeavourOS / Arch). I think you can say that to a lot of critical Linux system components though. Mint is generally one of the more stable distros out there though and generally considered to be the better Ubuntu.

              • Illecors
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                You think you don’t use it. Have firefox installed? All that apt install did was grab a wrapper for snap :( same for some other software.

          • @stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Personally I would pick Mint over Alma/Rocky as I am less familiar with RPM based distros than DEB based distros, I would recommend Mint over Debian as it is easier to get working with gaming, Ubuntu is great, but I won’t recommend snaps to a new user.

      • Krafting
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Linux is linux, no matter the distro! It’s not by arguing which distro is better that the year of the linux desktop will happen!!!

        • @hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Dunno. I’m not convinced the “year of Linux desktop” will ever happen. Granted, I now mostly use it for work, so I’m not up to date on the latest, but……

          1. Common distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc have extremely clunky upgrade system
          2. Microsoft Office. I’m sorry, libreoffice will not be a replacement.
          3. I heard this has improved, but Wayland used to be terrible.