@Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down139cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1158arrow-down1external-linkIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.com@Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square127fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareMeeechlinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoIf they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
minus-square@ridethisbike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoNah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
minus-square@Hule@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoI mean, you might have a point there. If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine. But… But… Seven ate nine. You ate eight! Seven nine! Waaaahhh!
If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
I mean, you might have a point there.
If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine.
But… But… Seven ate nine.
You ate eight!
Seven nine!
Waaaahhh!