• @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    The thing is, you can’t really separate the Chinese people from the CCP. Something like 7% of the population are members and the party has very high approval ratings. That’s not just because the CCP are good propagandists either. Rather the living conditions for the average Chinese person have improved dramatically over the course of only a few decades thanks to policy decisions made by the CCP. As such, opposing the CCP and wanting the Chinese people to thrive may be seen as a highly contradictory perspective to people living in mainland China.

      • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        While I would agree that many in the US have strong feelings about their party affiliation, I don’t think it’s quite the same.

        For one thing, by joining the CCP you are actually required to participate. I don’t know the numbers off hand, but I imagine far fewer people in the US actually participate in their local Democratic or Republican party clubs. Additionally, the approval ratings of democrats or republicans is lower than the CCP’s even if you only poll their respective party members.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      I’m referring to people in both China and Taiwan, and the CCP is certainly bad for the latter. I want people in both countries to prosper.

      • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        I’m not convinced the CCP has to be bad news for the latter. The CCP has a very economistic mindset when it comes to dealing with internal strife within China. As such, I think they would potentially settle for an economic union with certain security guarantees which would allow Taiwan to remain politically independent.

        • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          The most pragmatic solution is to recognize Taiwan’s independence and pledge to protect it if they’re invaded. There is no logical reason to pursue unification if people in Taiwan don’t want it. If this economic union would be like the EU, where states are still independent countries, I’m in favor of it – provided Taiwan is willingly wanting to join it.

          • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            The problem with pursuing full independence is that not all Taiwanese people currently want the island to be a separate country given the deep cultural, familial, and economic ties they have to the mainland. That of course doesn’t mean those who are against independence trust the CCP. Unfortunately I think that nuance gets lost in western media.

              • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                The Taiwanese government would have to negotiate those terms with the mainland before any such referendum could happen. However, that’s unlikely to occur in the near term if the DPP, which is the “pro independence” party, wins the upcoming presidential elections. When combined, parties interested in negotiating with the mainland are polling higher than them. However, the DPP maintains a a slight lead with a plurality of support. Needless to say it’s a complicated situation. I doubt the issue of Taiwan’s future will be resolved anytime soon.

      • @cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        I don’t think we have any reliable polling data to say what the approval rating of the government was during the Great Leap Forward. However, Mao did lose a lot of influence within the CCP as a consequence. As such I think it’s safe to say there was lots of dissatisfaction at least within the party itself.

        As for why the CCP doesn’t drop their communists principles it’s simple. They’re still communists who believe in Marxism-Leninism. They just don’t have a principled aversion to markets as long as they’re useful for raising living standards and economic development.

        They do however have an aversion to political liberalization. This was in part informed by what they saw as a failure of the joint market and political reforms happening in Eastern European socialist countries. The CCP’s fear was that political liberalization would empower a nascent capitalist class which could lead to economic disaster. I don’t think they were necessarily wrong in this regard as that’s exactly what happened to Russia only a few years later.

        If you want the CCP to stop what you see as a silly socialist experiment you’ll have to give them better reasons to. The CCP isn’t irrational. They’re just working from a different set of assumptions than you are.

    • Mambabasa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -511 months ago

      That’s racist and orientalist af. A people and their government are never equated. They’re always separate things. That’s literally sinophobia. Will you tell us that PRC citizens overseas are equal to their government as well, justifying their repression overseas?

      • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        How is that racist at all? The comment wasn’t making it out to be a negative thing, or saying that Chinese citizens were somehow wrong by supporting the CCP. I just fail to see how it is racist to point out the fact that the CCP has supporters in China. Seems obvious.

        • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          You said they can’t be separated. If they can’t be separated, then functionally they’re the same thing, hence you very much did equate them.

          But I think maybe English is not your first language, so maybe you can be forgiven for using the language sloppily. If you know what I mean.