@TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months agoAmazon drought: 'We've never seen anything like this'www.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1178arrow-down14
arrow-up1174arrow-down1external-linkAmazon drought: 'We've never seen anything like this'www.bbc.co.uk@TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareripcordlinkfedilink18•edit-211 months agoThere’s lots of evidence of domestication, cultivation, tending over the last 13,000+ years. But calling it a “planted forest” - like as if the majority of plants out in the Amazon were seeded/planted manually by humans - seems like a huge stretch.
minus-square@burgersc12@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-211 months agoAccording to this paper, about 1/5 by people
minus-squareripcordlinkfedilink10•11 months agoOk, but that’s still really far off from being a “planted forest”.
minus-square@webghost0101@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoThere probably different zones, deeper ones are natural and authentic, zones at the borders will be mostly planted. Its probably fair to call the amazon a collection of forests and other biomes rather then “a forest” but i am no ecologist so don’t quote me on that.
There’s lots of evidence of domestication, cultivation, tending over the last 13,000+ years. But calling it a “planted forest” - like as if the majority of plants out in the Amazon were seeded/planted manually by humans - seems like a huge stretch.
According to this paper, about 1/5 by people
Ok, but that’s still really far off from being a “planted forest”.
There probably different zones, deeper ones are natural and authentic, zones at the borders will be mostly planted.
Its probably fair to call the amazon a collection of forests and other biomes rather then “a forest” but i am no ecologist so don’t quote me on that.