we live in hell

I don’t even understand the pitch? you have the disc playing, in your hands, your ownership, no buffering, no subscription required. and they’re saying…hey do you want a worse experience?

      • @gentooer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1511 months ago

        Would it be possible to argue that this is copyright infringement? They’re basically screencapping copyrighted content at a shitty framerate and distributing it over the internet.

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          They’re not distributing it. They’re taking a screenshot, identifying the content, and transmitting hashed and aggregated data. Even if they were transmitting screenshots, they’d be transmitting it to their own systems to be hashed and analyzed, not watched.

        • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You agreed to it when you set up the device. It should be illegal to have incredibly obtuse and impossible to read T&C, they should make it abundantly clear exactly how much of your personal information is being given away, but unfortunately it’s legal to just have a little checkbox that lets you lie about reading them.

        • No, see my comment to FlyingSquid about how I assume things work under the hood. The only logical design choice I can imagine is that a hash of the content snapshot is being computed locally, and only the hash is transmitted.

    • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2911 months ago

      Sure, but they do take snaps of the screen and send it to advertisers. Almost all “smart” TVs do this.

    • Konala Koala
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      And then someone gets the idea to find a way to play a VHS instead and be like “Let’s see you read that, you fucking spying idiots!”