This is literally just the r/nyt subreddit about The New York Times.

Given he apparently takes inspiration from Elon Musk, it’s only a matter of time until u/spez starts adding post view limits unless you pay extra.

  • @popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    1121 year ago

    Someone should answer the phone because we all fucking called it.

    What’s next in the Reddit bingo?

    The removal of old reddit?

    Limiting the number of posts we can see per day as a normal user?

    Buy upvotes?

    The slippery slope logical fallacy doesn’t count when there is actual factual evidence.

    • Cryptic Fawn
      link
      fedilink
      561 year ago

      The removal of old reddit?

      Yep, they will absolutely do that. Only a matter of time.

    • XYZinferno
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Buy upvotes?

      The sad part is, I can absolutely see this happening. Not as an outright “gib money get updoot” but something more roudabout but effectively the same thing.

      “Be heard louder with Reddit Premium! Your comments on posts will be displayed closer to the top for others to see!”

      To reiterate, the above is just something I mocked up. May not be upvotes, but still rigging threads by paying Reddit money. I just wouldn’t be surprised at this point.

      • @BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A new tier: reddit ultimate

        With reddit ultimate you get all the benefits of reddit premium plus you get the ability to link your online and offline personas as well as a weekly free loot box.

        Loot boxes (8USD each or 10 for 50USD) may contain one of the following perks:

        • a week of free Reddit ultimate.
        • “3 nuclear downvotes”, like a normal downvote but counts as 50.
        • “karma MSG”, for 12 hours all karma you get or lose is counted twice.
        • “look into the shadows”, get a complete list of all your shadow bans.
        • “STFU”, mute all chats for a week.
        • “sacrificial lamb”, remove any or all non-ultimate users from your followers.
        • “heeeere’s Johnny!”, banned from a sub? Guess again, and this time you can’t get banned by non-ultimate mods for a week.
        • 5 gold awards, appears in 17 out of 24 loot boxes

        A as a new democracy oriented initiative, for 50USD you get to dethrone one mod for a month.

        The loot boxes would actually be able to get me back, not to buy them of course, but to see the havoc it would bring to r/Conservative.

      • @popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s sort of what World of Warcraft did with gold.

        The gold farms were making TONS of money selling illegal gold in much the same way upvote farms are making a killing.

        Upvotes are free for them to give, and they would have a money printer on their hands.

    • @Bobert@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      The slippery slope is only a fallacy when you’re making leaps. To go from enacting exorbitant API fees to removal of old Reddit is a logical step so doesn’t make for a fallacy. Intent also plays a part for the same reason. If you can prove that enacting exorbitant API fees was for the purpose of restricting user access then limiting number of posts for users not logged in is a logical step. Slippery slope gets a bad rap but it can be a valid point and not a fallacy when done properly.

      • @legion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People get “slippery slope” wrong. Not every sequence of events is a slope.

        The idea of slippery slope is that one small action is said to kick off an unstoppable chain reaction. It doesn’t just mean that A leads to B. It means that A inevitably leads to B, even if it didn’t intend to, and B happening can’t be stopped once A happens. And maybe even the people that wanted A don’t want B but can’t stop it, because we’ve slipped and we’re sliding uncontrollably down the slope. That’s the whole concept, that we’re stuck sliding.

        Reddit doing one restrictive action, and then later choosing to do another restrictive action, probably doesn’t apply. There’s seemingly no slope, just an easily foreseeable sequence of events.

        • @fische_stix@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          When the slope is engineered and intentionally constructed per design it likely isn’t slippery. This Reddit slide is decline, which is a type of slope in some context, but it isn’t slippery.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      What’s next in the Reddit bingo?

      See what stupid shit Musk pulled with Twitter a month ago, and that’ll be what Reddit does in a few days.

    • Bucky
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Old reddit and New reddit will probably cease to exist when sh.reddit is ready.

      • @gridleaf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        What’s the difference between new.reddit and sh.reddit? They look nearly identical, but with different margins and padding.

        • Bucky
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I don’t really know because I haven’t spent much time with it. I do remember either in one of the mod summits or somewhere that Spez admitted that new reddit was bad and that they were already working on the next version of reddit, which is what sh.reddit is supposed to be. New reddit is an abomination and I’ve only ever used it for settings old reddit does not have.

          But to be honest with you, I haven’t really spent any time on sh.reddit because you used to not be able to log in to it.

    • LUHG
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Everything you listed is on the table for them. I hope they do it so it dies quickly.