Sales targets meant to ensure automakers ramp up EV production to keep up with demand, says source

  • @OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    That’s really the biggest issue that’s unfortunately not at the forefront. Sure, EVs are much more energy efficient and therefore less polluting in the form of fossil fuel burn, but the way we travel is incredibly inefficient given the available technologies. Our country was literally built on the railroad, yet there is very little reasonable passenger rail alternatives in much of the country.

    • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      EVs are much more energy efficient

      Isn’t the lifetime difference something like 30% better than ICE? It’s definitely better, but it isn’t significantly better.

        • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          I’ve heard cars described as metal overcoats. People slap them on for the slightest reason.

      • @OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ll use my two, similar sized cars as an example (Subaru Outback and Hyundai Ioniq 5). Typical driving gets me around 8 L/100km in the Outback and 20 kWh/100km in the Ioniq. This NRCan site gives a conversion factor of 8.9 kWh/L of gasoline.

        So, the Ioniq, at 20 kWh/100km is then about 72% more efficient than the Subaru at its equivalent 71.2 kWh/100km.

        Even when considering lifetime emissions, EVs still have roughly 50% less emissions than ICE vehicles.

        However, going back to my original point, person vehicles are still incredibly inefficient overall, given the potential alternatives.