• Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Bit of a tangent, but I find it insane that the US spent over 2000 billion to fight the war in Afghanistan, but congress is unwilling to authorise giving the Ukrainians 60 billion. A relatively small amount, that means Ukrainians can keep fighting Russia, decreasing the likelihood of American troops ever having to get involved in a war in Europe.

    • TheMongoose
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Ah, but from where I sit (a long way from the US), it looks more like a pissing contest between the Republicans to see who can be the most terrible human being in government, than it does look like any sort of actual policy or principal.

      It’s not about helping Ukraine, or avoiding the mistakes of Afghanistan - it’s about trying to make Biden (and/or ‘The Dems’ in general) look bad, even if that involves civilian deaths.

      Are they evil, Russian agents or just absolute clowns? It doesn’t really matter, does it. The end result is the same.

      • @Zoop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        From someone in the US, smack dab in the middle of very dense Republican land (Oklahoma,) I want you to know that you’ve nailed it! You’re spot on. I wish you were exaggerating, lol.

    • @sqgl@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I once did the sums to calculate that USA could have afforded a run a gun buyback scheme (like Australia) rather than invade Iraq, you know… to cut down on Americans killing Americans.

      • Hyperreality
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I did the sums, and the US would have been able to fund a large moonbase for the next century, mine asteroids AND seriously begin colonising Mars.

        But instead of becoming an interplanetary power, the US chose to blow up brown farmers.

    • @Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      But that 2000 billion went directly into the military industrial complex. Ka-ching.

      Is the same true for that 60 billion?