The Texas Supreme Court ruled against Kate Cox, the pregnant mother who sought permission to obtain an emergency abortion, on Monday.

“These laws reflect the policy choice that the Legislature has made, and the courts must respect that choice,” the court’s seven-page ruling read. The court found that Cox’s doctor, Dr. Damla Karsan, had “asked a court to pre-authorize the abortion yet she could not, or at least did not, attest to the court that Ms. Cox’s condition poses the risks the exception requires.”

Cox, who is 20 weeks pregnant and a mother of two, had filed a lawsuit against Texas over its restrictive abortion bans. Her fetus was found to have a fatal condition known as Trisomy 18. The baby has no chance of survival, but under state law, there are only two options available to Cox: a vaginal delivery, or a C-section. Either option would risk her life or her ability to have children in the future.

Earlier on Monday, Cox’s lawyers said she was forced to flee the state to get medical care.

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -931 year ago

    And if you vote Democrat, you’re clearly OK with all they do, regardless of what you call yourself.

    How’s that suit you? You are why we can’t have a civil discussion in this country. You emotional little bitches stomp all political discourse. You are hurting our country. Video may be new to many of you, but it’s Jon Stewart at his finest. That one got the show cancelled, because it was too fucking embarrassing for both sides. And if you liked that, you’ll love this.

    But you can’t see that, can you? Because you’re right and they’re wrong. They have no right to speak. I mean, it’s plain as day, objectively true, you’re right.

    I’m about to work on an old shotgun. Cool experiment that I…

    “School children killing scum!”

    I also vote straight D.

    “Baby killing vermin!”

    See how that works?

    And you wonder how fascists like Trump and Musk find a populist voice. You have no idea where their supporters come from. What a mystery.

    Here’s the part where I “get schooled” on the paradox of intolerance. Way ahead of ya kid, wasn’t born yesterday.

    And if I could be more condescending, I would be.

    • AnonTwo
      link
      fedilink
      46
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Calling people emotional little bitches while making a shitstorm of a whine…

      I mean, yeah. I would vote democrat if the other option is republican. Because things like abortion rights, the constant voter suppression attempts, and supreme court (people who were chosen by republican representatives and proceeded to lie to the country) Would kindof be where I would draw the line.

      Yeah, if that’s not where you draw the line, then we don’t really have something compromisable. Because a significant portion of that is violated human rights, and the other parts would make it harder to actually fix those issues in the long-term.

      Sure, there doesn’t have to be a good and evil. The party is currently doing evil things, and if you are sticking to your guns with that party, then what exactly are we supposed to say? I wouldn’t even say Democrat is being a good party, it’s just not doing things I would consider reprehensible.

      And that’s purely going off the domestic policy. Not even going off the fact that there’s some very clear proof that the republican party has Russian government infestation corrupting it.

      If you don’t think nows the time to make a clear sign the party needs to reform, then I think there’s a problem there.

      TL;DR: We draw our lines, and unfortunately the line to draw for the republican party has crossed some pretty problematic points over the past 10 years.

      • @shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -39
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, it’s time to tell Nazis enough is enough and their shit is over. Yes, it’s time to fight back, harder than most liberals are prepared for. But when a person like OP makes a simple statement that they’re Republican, and yet OP disagrees with them, out come the pitchforks?

        I also vote straight D.

        You were not listening. Talk about preaching to the choir, I could have written your post myself, and I have, many, many times. Think you’re telling me something I don’t know? Something I haven’t seen or considered?

        But voting straight D isn’t fucking good enough, is it? Assholes downvote every voice that doesn’t toe the party line. Comrade. (That’s an insult from the 80s. It means one that falls in lockstep with what they’re told, no thought required or permitted.)

        Keep pushing down every “unliked” opinion. See what that’s bought so far? Toxic populism, fascism, powering the disaffected and powerless, who only wish to have a say, even if they’re wrong or confused. Was it worth the price to stomp their voice out and not engage in good faith? And even if they don’t listen, wasn’t it worth the effort to try reaching them?

        FFS, even the most sane, moderate voices get no play. Bought and paid for, lay in the made bed, pushing allies away with hate. Always worked in the past!

        Don’t come crying to me when defenseless against the Christo-fascists you’ve enabled by stomping out discourse. “How could this have happened?”

        (Still waiting for the lecture on the “paradox of intolerance”. It’s a real thing and worthy of discussion.)

    • @idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      you emotional little bitches stomp all political discourse

      And if I could be more condescending, I would be

      Thanks for doing your part to foster political discourse.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Holy logical fallacies, Batman!

      You’ve got a bunch of strawmen, you’ve got the hasty generalization fallacy, the slothful induction fallacy, you’ve of course got plenty ad hominems, a bunch of strawman combos such as a strawman-slippery slope combo or two, a no true Scotsman strawman and a strawman bandwagon fallacy and you’ve probably got one or two I missed as well.

      In conclusion: you’re an idiot, arguing in bad faith, or an idiot arguing in bad faith. I’d stake money on it being the latter.

    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every little thing? Of course not. When it comes to something as major as basic bodily autonomy? Yeah. When we’re talking about active violations of rights and the active effort to expand said violations of rights, not actively fighting against it is actively being for it. Sitting on your ass while these things happen because MUH BOTH SIDES doesn’t make you noble, it makes you complicit in the blatant death march towards authoritarian we are on.

      I hope to whatever higher power is out there that I’m off my ass wacko off base here, but considering the trajectory we’re on, just know that the fault will primarily lie in the hands of those who simply sat on their asses doing nothing.

    • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I’d ask if you vote Republican but your Temper Tantrum over your Parties own policies already answered it!