• @PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -71 year ago

    no you just have to be a psychopath to suggest it.

    Ah. Miss the point and make a stupid medical diagnosis? Not the best start. I’ll get back to this.

    They used the service as it’s intended - picked some people and brands to follow then refreshed their feed.

    If it’s organic why did nobody else see the combo? They literally behaved in a way no other user has, and it was contrived to find edge cases in the ad service. It’s not organic use.

    We’re talking about facts and definitions. There’s no reason for you to be this worked up, angry or vile to other people.

    • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Ah. Miss the point and make a stupid medical diagnosis? Not the best start. I’ll get back to this.

      yeah suggesting murdering animals as a method to defend free speech was you’re weird tactic mate, not mine.

      So you’re suggesting without the ‘contrived’ method of selecting people to follow, which is part of twitter’s core features, that no one would see these issues?

      Because that’s a lie. It’s happened to hundreds of users. And seeing awful shit on twitter is getting more regular because of Musk’s idiotic reversal on content moderation. https://time.com/6295711/twitters-hate-content-advertisers/

      You literally don’t know what you’re talking about or are being intentionally disingenous - it’s gross and sad. Fuck off with your bullshit, you defend nazis and their proponents - what the fuck is wrong with you?

      And how dare you criticize anyone for getting worked up about your nazi apologist bullshit, you suggested mowing cats, sicko.