• @viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Not at all, but long term storage of exhausted nuclear rods still costs an unknown amount of money endless centuries into the future. So you can’t really put a number on the final bill.

      • @realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Some types of reactors can also use those waste products as fuel and in turn make them into other waste products that only last a couple hundred years, so it’s not a easy calculation to make unless you know what’s deployed in the future.

        • @viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That has been suggested for decades, problem is that if any of the transporters blow up on their way to space, you essentially have a dirty bomb covering half the planet. No bueno.

    • @MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It was usually old-style (insecure) and expensive, covered with hidden funding, or new tech (somewhat secure) and even more expensive.