Tesla Cybertruck’s stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts::The angular design of Tesla’s Cybertruck has safety experts concerned that the electric pickup truck’s stiff stainless-steel exoskeleton could hurt pedestrians and cyclists.

  • @SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 months ago

    Your wording makes it sound like the existence of even more dangerous trucks somehow excuses this dangerous truck. Both the 4 ft wall and the sharp metal blade edges are dangerous and irresponsible designs.

    • @hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      I’m not excusing it at all, I think it’s one of the worst vehicles ever made, too big, heavy and fast. People are for sure gonna crash these beasts.

      What I meant was I’d like to see traditional truck designs that have millions of vehicles on the road be scrutinized before the 10 cyber trucks. You’re way more likely to be hit by a regular truck which has a deadly design than a cyber truck just because of how many more are on the road.

      • @SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 months ago

        “I don’t like x but it can’t be worse than y” is a construction which serves to minimize how bad something is. Instead, let’s scrutinize both: “This cyber truck is ridiculously dangerous. While we’re at it, let’s also regulate the 4 feet tall wall of grill on other trucks.”

        • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          Instead, let’s scrutinize both

          is a construction that leads to nothing getting done as a result of failing to acknowledge there are limited resources.

          The concept of “first” is absolutely key to accomplishing anything.

          • @steveman_ha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            … Doesn’t “limited resources” basically just mean here ones ability to consider more than one thought at a time? Surely a species capable of collaborative efforts like space travel can handle the complexity of generalizing to say “no, sorry, none of the human-bulldozer designs are okay actually”?

          • @SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            Criticism is not a scarce quantity to be preserved. It spreads, like a fire. Take literally any social movement, like #metoo or BLM. People don’t suppress smaller stories to “save” criticism for bigger stories. The small stories add up. Right now, the F150 is one of the best selling cars in the US. The average American is no where close to criticizing it. But everyone already makes fun of the cyber truck. We can use that.

            “Let’s not criticize this dangerous truck design because we should save our criticism!” is the worst way to get people to criticize dangerous truck design.