• @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      You seem confused. E2EE doesn’t mean peer-to-peer. Signal protocol isn’t peer-to-peer. You don’t need to be peer-to-peer to have secure communication because E2EE makes it so that the server can’t read what the two ends are writing.

      • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Can you prove to me that WhatsApp actually encrypts the message on the phone in such a way that WhatsApp can’t see the message when it’s on their server?

        Do you truly believe a company owned by Meta would provide that kind of security from THEM? A company whose income is profiting on DATA supplied by users?

        Tell me you believe this.

        • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          We know they certainly implemented it at one point. So it’s not a big ask to do that for Messenger. And like someone said, would probably benefit them too since don’t have to give info they don’t have. But with it being closed source, it can’t be verified if they’re using it now.

          • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Do you believe that Meta, if given the opportunity, would choose personal privacy over making money? It’s an easy yes, or no question to answer. 

                  • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I’m not Meta, so I can’t give you a detailed breakdown of how they use the data they collect to make money. So, let’s assume by money I just mean money from their many sources. It’s a pretty easy question with only one answer.