After a spy camera designed to look like a towel hook was purchased on Amazon and illegally used for months to capture photos of a minor in her private bathroom, Amazon was sued.

The plaintiff—a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia—argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

Amazon hoped the court would dismiss the suit, arguing that the platform wasn’t responsible for the alleged criminal conduct harming the minor. But after nearly eight months deliberating, a judge recently largely denied the tech giant’s motion to dismiss.

Amazon’s biggest problem persuading the judge was seemingly the product descriptions that the platform approved. An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon’s product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera. Text on that product image promoted the spycams, boasting that they “won’t attract attention” because each hook appears to be “a very ordinary hook.”

  • @chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -71 year ago

    when we both realize that filming someone in your bathroom without their consent is illegal.

    Well, you just said “it’s a complicated question that is going to be different based on jurisdiction.”

    If it’s not illegal in the jurisdictions this product is being sold, then your ‘it’s illegal’ argument holds no water. Hence why I asked you to cite where you’re getting your information.

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Yes, it’s complicated because I would have to answer the question multiple different ways. Like 2 party consent states are going to be different than 1 party consent states. And every state is going to be slightly different, with Brazil also being different.

      But it seems like we agree: it’s illegal to film someone in your bathroom without their consent. So why the busy-work exercise?