• @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Iirc Brother printers are heading down a similar dark path. Though I don’t recall where I got that info, so take it with a grain of salt.

    Edit: I somehow misspelled brother.

      • @maccentric@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        And yet, somehow still better than HP.

        I can’t stand that company (their laptops are shite as well, except for maybe some of the Omens).

            • @Seventhlevin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I’ll have to take your word for it because I’ve had a xerox laser for 2 years now that works flawlessly and the software isn’t nearly as abhorrent as brother’s

              • @NaoPb@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I have two Brother laser printers, an older one and a newer one. Both still work great. When I see people recommending Brother online it’s mainly the laser printers. Maybe they’re just made differently from the inkjet printers.

                I’m glad you are having good experience with a Xerox and I would like to know how they compare to Brother ones on a price point. Do they cost a lot more? Also good to know about the software. I’ve personally only used my printers with the default drivers that came with Linux.

                P.S. I also have a Kyocera laser printer which I’ve never had any issues with.

                • @Seventhlevin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  In my experience, an equivalent Xerox machine is always more expensive. But, the software is extremely lightweight and also customizable, although I run it on a windows machine. The print quality is second to none as well.