WormGPT Is a ChatGPT Alternative With ‘No Ethical Boundaries or Limitations’::undefined

    • @Geek_King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1091 year ago

      Did you check out the article, because it’s most definitely not a good thing. It was created to assist with cybercrime things, like writing malware, crafting emails for phishing attacks. The maker is selling access with a monthly fee to criminals to use it. This was unavoidable though, can’t put the tooth paste back into the tube on this one.

      • @EM1sw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        471 year ago

        Good point and all, but my first thought was that it could finally tell me who would win in various hypothetical fights lol

        • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 year ago

          Wasn’t that a show on Discovery at one point? Deadliest Warrior. It was simulations using different technologies to figure out who or what would win in a fight. Newer technology would certainly make it more interesting, but you can only make up so much information, lol.

          • @Rawgasmic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            It was on SpikeTV back in the day and while it used cool tech simulations their sims were heavily weighted by their chosen experts. There were a few notable episodes that caused some fan uproar because one side had won despite weird odds or chosen simulation to display.

            If I remember right ninja vs spartan was one such episode. It seemed like the ninjas possessed all the tools necessary to beat the Spartans and even got it down to something like a 1v4 or 2v5 before a completely unrealistic turnaround.

            • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Yes, it was Spike. I specifically remember having watched that episode. I assume it’s because the movie 300 was probably relevant at the time, but that might be confirmation bias on my part. It would be interesting to do a comparison with ai vs the models they created on the show.

              • @Rawgasmic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                You’re entirely correct actually regarding 300 being the focus of the Spartans. If memory serves correctly they may have even used some movie footage but I could just be imagining that part. It’s been a long while since I watched it.

          • @EM1sw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            I meant more like Shaq with a 2x4 vs eight Gary Colemans with nunchucks, but that was a good show at the time

              • ChatGPTB
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                TITLE: “Giant vs Dyna-Mite”

                The scene opens in a gritty, dimly lit alleyway. Shaquille O’Neal, better known as Shaq, firmly clutches a 2x4, his formidable stature casting a shadow that dwarfs the surroundings. Gary Coleman, with an aura of confidence that belies his size, swings his nunchucks ominously by his side.

                As the tension rises, a suspenseful murmur intensifies in the atmospheric soundtrack. In the distant background, muted street lights flicker casting their glow on the scenery intermittently, beautifully weaving a noir effect.

                The two opponents lock eyes. The disparity in their sizes becomes more evident - the giant versus the dynamite. Yet the flicker in Coleman’s eyes reveals a determination to demonstrate that size isn’t everything.

                Shaq scoffs, his deep booming voice reverberating off the alley walls, “You ready to get SHAQ’d, Coleman?” he taunts.

                Gary, undeterred, smirks, “Bring it on, O’Neal.”

                They circle each other, gauging and planning their moves. Suddenly, Coleman dashes forward, his nunchucks whirling like steel dragons in the semi-darkness. Surprisingly agile, Shaq sidesteps, wielding his 2x4 as a shield.

                Shaq swings, but Coleman nimbly evades the hit using his nunchucks to deflect the follow-up thrust. The audience is at the edge of their seats, the skill and precision of Coleman leaving them in awe.

                But Shaq, employing his strength and size, manages to disarm Gary and with a swift move, he ‘SHAQs’ him. As if redefining his own verb, he uses a basketball fake-out move followed by a powerful thump, sending Gary sprawling.

                As the dust settles, both men pant heavily, but it’s clear who the victor is. Even though Shaq stands tall, it’s evident from his demeanor that he acknowledges the smaller man’s courage and fighting prowess. This was not an easy win.

                And so, just as the day surrenders to the night, in this gritty cinematic faceoff in an alleyway, the giant Shaq, armed with his formidable 2x4, emerges victorious over the dynamite Gary Coleman though his victory is a testament to their respective skill and courage, forever immortalizing this epic battle scene in the annals of film history.

    • @TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      I work in Cybersecurity for an F100 and we’ve been war gaming for shit like this for a while. There are just so many unethical uses for the current gen of AI tools like this one, and it keeps me up at night thinking about the future iterations of them to be honest.

      • @anakaine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Treat CVEs as prompts and introduce target fingerprinting to expose CVEs. Gets you one step closer to script kidding red team ops. Not quite, but it would be fun if it could do the network part too and chain responses back into the prompt for further assessment.

        • @TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          We’re expecting multiple AI agents to be working concert on different parts of a theoretical attack, and you nailed it with thinking about the networking piece. While a lot of aspects of a cyber attack tend to evolve with time and technical change, the network piece tends to be more “sturdy” than others and because of this it is believed that extremely competent network intrusion capabilities will be developed and deployed by a specialized AI.

          I think we’ll be seeing the development of AI’s that specialize in malware payloads, working with one’s that have social engineering capabilities and ones with network penetration specializations, etc…all operating at a much greater competency than their human counterparts (or just in much greater numbers than humans with similar capabilities) soon.

          I’m not really even sure what will be effective in countering them either? AI-powered defense I guess but still feel like that favors the attacker in the end.