@psy32nd@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • edit-21 year agohypocrite.locklemmy.worldimagemessage-square160fedilinkarrow-up1404arrow-down1154
arrow-up1250arrow-down1imagehypocrite.locklemmy.world@psy32nd@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • edit-21 year agomessage-square160fedilink
minus-square@oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyzlinkfedilink1•1 year agoReally? What about bestiality?
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoyea. that, too, is an aesthetic issue. it can be gross without being immoral.
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoyou think gross things are immoral?
minus-square@oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyzlinkfedilink1•1 year agoI think that having sex with sentient beings without their consent is extremely immoral
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agosentience and consent have nothing to do with one another.
minus-square@oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyzlinkfedilink1•1 year agosomeone experiencing it should have a say in whether or not they experience it
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoonce again, we are going to be disagreeing on the relevant definitions of “someone”.
minus-square@oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyzlinkfedilink1•1 year agothe experiencers should have a say in whether or not they experience it
Really? What about bestiality?
yea. that, too, is an aesthetic issue. it can be gross without being immoral.
We disagree very strongly
you think gross things are immoral?
I think that having sex with sentient beings without their consent is extremely immoral
sentience and consent have nothing to do with one another.
someone experiencing it should have a say in whether or not they experience it
once again, we are going to be disagreeing on the relevant definitions of “someone”.
How do you define “someone”?
the experiencers should have a say in whether or not they experience it