• @Darkard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 year ago

      “Excuse me madam but do you have a license to use those tits? No? Didn’t think so. The content of those bazongas is Nestle property. I’m afraid I’m going to have to clamp those nipples until such time as the proper Bandonkadonk subscriptions are paid”

      • @shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 year ago

        i got this new legal drama plot. basically there’s this patent infringer except she’s got huge boobs. i mean some serious honkers. a real set of badonkers. packin some dobonhonkeros. massive dohoonkabhankoloos. big ol’ tonhongerekoogers.

        what happens next?!

        lawyer shows up with even bigger bonkhonagahoogs. humongous hungolomghononoloughongous

        • Karyoplasma
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Who doesn’t like the dickcissel or the tufted tit-mouse?

      • @zaphod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        As long as the tits aren’t used for commercial purposes you don’t need a license. Anyway, I doubt that in Europe you could patent any naturally occuring molecules in any kind of milk.

          • @zaphod@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Maybe some countries’ patent offices don’t take their job serious, but in general there are loads of things you can patent. For example basically anything naturally occuring is not generally patentable, but you can patent methods for synthesising or extracting naturally occuring things.