- Mike Pezzullo was a central architect and inaugural boss of the Home Affairs Department.
- He has been stood down on full pay pending an inquiry into his conduct.
- Changes to secretary pay and conditions mean Mr Pezzullo might not receive a termination payment.
One of the most powerful figures in the public service has been sacked after leaked conversations revealed the depths of his attempts to influence the government on policy and the shape of government.
Mike Pezzullo, the head of the Home Affairs Department, was considered one of the most influential figures in the machinery of government even before alleged private conversations with a Liberal powerbroker exposed he had seemingly spent years using a political backchannel to influence prime ministers and undermine others.
[…]
The inquiry found Mr Pezzullo had broken the public service code of conduct on at least 14 occasions. The breaches included:
- Using his duty, power, status or authority to seek to gain a benefit or advantage for himself
- Engaged in gossip and disrespectful critique of ministers and public servants
- Failed to maintain confidentiality of sensitive government information
- Failed to act apolitically in his employment
- Failed to disclose a conflict of interest
There should be hefty fines, or even gaol time, for such blatant political interference by APS employees.
Yep.
The best we got was that he likely won’t rewarded for it.
"On Friday, a new pay determination that could seek to strip secretaries of their entitlements if they breach the public service code of conduct was signed off by the Remuneration Tribunal. "
The Guardian had a better way of explaining it.
“On Friday, the government’s salary umpire, the Remuneration Tribunal, quietly made a ruling revoking a requirement that secretaries and agency heads receive a payout if they’re sacked for breaching the rules.”
Imagine that.
Before Friday last week, a Department Secretary purposely and flagrantly breaking the rules could expect a payout for doing so.
I’m sure they get to keep the money they received while on paid leave pending any inquiry, which makes the arguments for penalties and fines even stronger.