• @Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -51 year ago

    Yes, isreali approved releases of ungeolocated video by approved journalists, not investigators.

    We knew there were bunkers under all shifa, we knew there were tunnels under al shifa, we know both of these things because Israel used them when they controlled the hospital. What we don’t have is a. Proof hamas made them, b. That is used offensively c. That there was any use prior to Israel breaking a wall down to gain access to tunnels and bunkers they admit they built.

    Ditto bud, your own sources say they do not look recently used.

    • @LaLiLuLuCo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Also the proof is that hamas made them in their own style, far away from the Israeli built Bunker and on lower levels.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        They’re own style, you mean the Roman Arch and a fucking wall? Who could have thought of that aside from ww1 trenches, WW2 trenches, isreali trenches or I dunno literally anyone past like 1000bc.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        It’s delusional to want evidence from experts who are actually there, not from journalists who have a perverse incentive to release only what Israel allows.

        Wait for things to actually be investigated before calling it proof. It’s absurd to take sides during a war with evidence that’s solely controlled by one party and supported only by their allies.

        Wait, see. Don’t trust the people who have a track record of lying about the same shit they’re talking about now and that goes equally to Hamas as it does to Israel.

        But you know, logic huh? Why bother, who needs that. We all know the scientific method is “trust Ted, it benefits him more than anyone but why would ted lie?”