• @ToothlessFairy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1251 year ago

    I enjoy using copilot, but it is not made to think for you. It’s a better autocomplete, but don’t ever let it do more than a line at once.

      • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        As a software engineer, the number of people I encounter in a given week who either refuse to or are incapable of understanding that distinction baffles and concerns me.

        • @EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          That’s because it’s being advertised as a solution. That’s why you have people worried it’ll take their jobs when in reality it’ll let them do the job better.

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      The problem I have with it is that all the time it saves me I have to use on reading the code. I probably spend more time on that as once in a while the code it produces is broken in a subtle way.

      I see some people swearing by it, which is the opposite of my experience. I suspect that if your coding was copying code from stack overflow then it indeed improved your experience as now this process is streamlined.

        • oce 🐆
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I don’t know if it does yet, but if ChatGPT starts providing source for every information, then it would make it much faster to find the relevant information and check their sources, rather than clicking websites one by one.

          • @tourist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Yep, ChatGPT4 allows optional calls to Bing now.

            It used to have a problem with making a claims that were not relevant to or contradicted its own sources, but I don’t recall encountering that problem recently.