@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world • 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square160fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down123cross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworldnews@lemmy.mlfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square160fedilinkcross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworldnews@lemmy.mlfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-square@CraigeryTheKid@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoYeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so. We should eat less meat though.
minus-square@Aux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-9•1 year agoWe sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.
Yeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so.
We should eat less meat though.
We sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.