• AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Using a vast array of technology including lasers are finely tuned sensors, they are trying to find gaps in their security and patch them up before they even arrive in the world.

    The actual chip doing the encryption can show signs of what it is doing: while processors might seem like abstract electronics, they throw out all sorts of heats and signals that could be useful to an attacker.

    But they are up against highly compensated hackers: in recent years, there has grown up to be an advanced set of companies offering cyber weapons to the highest bidder, primarily for use against people working to better the world: human rights activists, journalists, diplomats.

    But recent years have also seen it locked in an escalating battle: Lockdown Mode might have been a breakthrough of which it is proud, but it was only needed because of an unfortunate campaign to break into people’s phones.

    It is not the kind of difficulty that comes even with other security work; those stealing passwords or scamming people out of money don’t have lobbyists and government power.

    The kind of highly targeted, advanced attacks that Lockdown Mode and other features guard against however are costly and complicated, meaning they will often be done by governments that could cause difficulties for Apple and other technology companies.


    The original article contains 2,167 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 90%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @danhab99@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Downvote me if you must but what if Apple accidentally became the Privacy community’s greatest ally? I know it can’t happen bc they’ll always keep a back door for their data mining

      • stevedidWHAT
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        A back door is not what apple uses to collect data, that’s very very different from sending analytics.

        Apple already outperforms google by 3x in terms of privacy points collected.

        Wanna talk about backdoors? Check out the exploit list for android phones compared to iPhones. Nuff said.

        • @cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          How does a multimillion dollar company beat a trillion dollar company ath their own security game? Also stop suing Corellium is a good start, don’t sue when you get caught lying, do better.

          • stevedidWHAT
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Idk but there’s plenty of other android os that are more secure than what google puts out. And they make substantially less.

            Google hasn’t been the same since the switch regarding “evil” and “ethics”.

            Anyone can see that.

        • @Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -19
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Can you post some reliable evidence or are you talking out of your ass, now you’re just looking like an angry iBoy

          • @deleted@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The pragmatic approach used for comparing Android and iOS helps to understand that Android is more susceptible to security breaches and malware attacks.

            https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1574013721000125

            Across all studied apps, our study highlights widespread potential violations of US, EU and UK privacy law, including 1) the use of third-party tracking without user consent, 2) the lack of parental consent before sharing personally identifiable information (PII) with third-parties in children’s apps, 3) the non-data-minimising configuration of tracking libraries, 4) the sending of personal data to countries without an adequate level of data protection, and 5) the continued absence of transparency around tracking, partly due to design decisions by Apple and Google. Overall, we find that neither platform is clearly better than the other for privacy across the dimensions we studied.

            https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13722

          • stevedidWHAT
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            You had to call me a 3rd grade name just to feel like you won.

            Pretty sad.

          • @DeadlineX@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            -doesn’t agree with/like what somebody else says: immediately jump to insults.

            Come on. Let’s not insult people because we don’t like what they say. We can do better. We should do better. If people just got along with others who are different or have different interests, the whole world would be a better place.

            Genuinely, I am asking you to reevaluate how you respond, and maybe just try to be a little nicer to others. It costs nothing and makes the world a little bit better every time.

      • southsamurai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Hell, if they legitimately stopped their data collection, that would be enough to tip me into iOS until a truly good linux phone in my price range happens.

      • @Vub@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I’m curious, do you have a source for them having a backdoor and mining data?

          • @Vub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Wow OK, well that doesn’t have any value then. It’s best not to spread rumours since eich behaviour it can easily spread to other, more important, issues in society.