If I say “the sun rises in the morning”, is that also an “implication of status and reasonability”? Do explain how a neutral statement implies “status and reasonability”. Go ahead!
Also explain what an “implication of fashion” is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I’d be surprised if that’s news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.
You also failed to show how I said anything about something being “inherently attractive”. Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.
If you’re going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.
I don’t believe I made any comment about what’s “inherently attractive” or “reasonable” to “wear on your face”. What’s with the loaded question?
Implication of status and reasonability.
Supposition of validity and established status.
Implication of fashion, which includes makeup, which is worn on face.
If you’re going to blatantly lie, do it in a setting where you won’t get called out for being a filthy liar.
If I say “the sun rises in the morning”, is that also an “implication of status and reasonability”? Do explain how a neutral statement implies “status and reasonability”. Go ahead!
Also explain what an “implication of fashion” is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I’d be surprised if that’s news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion.
You also failed to show how I said anything about something being “inherently attractive”. Try to keep up with your own accusations, please.
If you’re going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said.