@DannyMac@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 1 year agoApple’s China ties under Congressional scrutiny after Jon Stewart cancellationarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1592arrow-down18cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.online
arrow-up1584arrow-down1external-linkApple’s China ties under Congressional scrutiny after Jon Stewart cancellationarstechnica.com@DannyMac@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmit.online
minus-square@interceder270@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•1 year agoHow do lawmakers demand something that isn’t a law?
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink3•1 year agoThey can request anyone to show up and speak about an issue, doesn’t mean anyone is required to answer them
minus-square@Welt@lazysoci.allinkfedilink1•1 year agoThey use the ‘demand’ rhetoric to gauge support for an idea, analyse the result, and if profitable draft and pass a bill to change the thing that isn’t a law into a law.
How do lawmakers demand something that isn’t a law?
Anyone can demand anything
deleted by creator
I demand you take that back!
I demand ham.
They can request anyone to show up and speak about an issue, doesn’t mean anyone is required to answer them
They use the ‘demand’ rhetoric to gauge support for an idea, analyse the result, and if profitable draft and pass a bill to change the thing that isn’t a law into a law.