• @Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sorta.

    At a very narrow per-tree level it’s indeed about a selfish desire of the pirate.

    At a broader forest-wide level it’s about the available choices having been artificially narrowed by legislation that creates a monopoly on copying. As seen more in the gaming world (mainly with GoG, Steam and indie titles) and even streaming video a few years ago, even with artificially narrow choices by law if the competition is still broad enough to provide lots of options at good prices, far fewer individuals will engage in Piracy, though as we see with streaming video, the artificial monopoly legislation ends up being sooner or later leveraged to narrow the available choices and Piracy flourishes in response.

    It’s not by chance that the very same individuals who have simpletion takes on just about every subject (not saying you, just some commenters here) also seem have the simpleton “piracy is bad because the law says so” take when commenting on this.

    • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It’s not the pirates that are Robin hood in this analogy, it’s the support network enabling piracy.