• @PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -191 year ago

    Ok, man from perfect country. How would you personally solve this problem of gun violence? Would you form a posse and roundup all of the crazed lunatics out there who would dare to try and protect their families with a firearm? Would you raid the houses of anyone who may or may not have owned a gun in the past and search under the floorboards?

    Seriously I want to know. How would you help all of these mentally ill people who seem to think that guns are toys, or just deeply want to harm other people?

    • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t need me to tell you that. You wouldn’t believe me anyway. There are plenty of professionals who have studied and acquired factual data of how other “perfect countries” do it and the differences. From the differences the solutions become very clear.

      It’s about restricting access, not banning. There’s no one size fits all solution because nothing is perfect so you pick your poison. Find a country where this doesn’t happen every day (so any developed country), look a the way they do things and pick the one you prefer to support - they all have upsides and downsides. What you have isn’t working though.

      • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -141 year ago

        Every country that has basically an effective ban, also has safety nets for the people, doesn’t have a gang problem like we do, and focuses on education and not locking everyone up. They also never had 450+ million firearms in civilian hands. So please share with the class how you think you could pull it off without having all those safety nets in place.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How about having all those safety nets in place and regulated guns? Just an idea…

          • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -81 year ago

            I’m fine with adding in the safety nets, they’ll do 100xs more than any regulation you put in place will do. I’m not ok giving over a monopoly on force to people like the current Republicans. Why any of you think that’s a good idea is just insane.

            • @iegod@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Wtf are you going to do here, go out shooting them or some bullshit? You really think you have any chance against the feds regardless of what side you swing for? That sounds pretty crazy to me. So let’s get real and understand your guns are for recreation not safety against tyranny.

              • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq all want a word with your complete lack of how wars are fought now.

                Also your neighbor is a gun owner, so when they bomb his house your shit is getting pushed in as well.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              How does regulating guns so this sort of thing doesn’t happen again give Republicans a monopoly on force?

              You think the only way to even out the odds is to keep guns in the hands of dangerously mentally ill people? Really?

              • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Because the only way for shit like this to not happen in your world of gun regulation, requires a total ban.

                And a total ban gives whoever is in charge of the government a monopoly on force.

                People like you will call Republicans nazis and fascist…then want to remove any force multiplier from civs and then pray they don’t get elected. You’re naive at best and ignorant at worse.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  The only way to stop severely mentally ill people from obtaining guns is a total ban? Are you absolutely sure about that? There’s no regulation out that that would mitigate the problem?

        • That’s an exaggeration. The US has a better safety net than a lot of countries with much less gun death and violence. Education could better for a rich country, but is not bad. I am all for locking fewer people up, but that’s not the reason there’s gun violence.

          This is always the argument against improving anything in the US. “We’re too special!” It’s just not true. Background checks, wait times, permit requirements, concealed carry restrictions, domestic violence restrictions, etc. These have all been empirically shown to reduce gun deaths in the US.

        • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe put those safety nets in place? Offer buy-backs on firearms, or a grace period to turn in unregistered firearms with no questions? Crack down on fraudulent “theft” and loss reports? Modernize the firearms database? Create incentives for law enforcement to execute red-flag laws? Require a higher level of training and responsibility to own a firearm?

          Literally doing the bare minimum and just effectively enforcing the laws on the books would make a huge improvement, but we can’t even do that because republicans like to whip up the base with the idea that their right to own an AR-15 is going to stop the liburl gubment from takin awah mah rites!