• @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -131 year ago

      No it hasn’t, no one in the history of the world has had this many firearms in civilian hands. Even when Australia took the firearms, only 60% turned in their 1mil total firearms in civ hands.

        • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -131 year ago

          Australia never had a firearm problem to begin with. This is pants on head stupid take. If you have 100 deaths from firearms a year and removing access to the already small amount in civ hands and gun deaths drop to 50… everyone now says firearms removed from people dropped by 50% when it was already so low it was a rounding error to begin with.

          • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, we just had the largest massacre of private citizens by a single shooter in recorded history, (still hasn’t been beaten despite how often Americans try, they must really hate us being better than them at something involving guns), and numerous others before it, and none after it. But tell me again how you know nothing about Australia, it’s history, or gun control.

            • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -61 year ago

              Uhh…no you didn’t, but ok.

              You also did not have high violence involving firearms prior to port author. They also were already trending down prior to the 97 ban and forced confiscation.

              https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi269

              Suicides, just like the USA, make up the majority of your firearm deaths. You’re homicides via firearms are a joke per year, our gangs alone do that in a month in a single city.

              But yes, I’m the one who knows nothing about Australia and it’s gun history…lol sounds like you need to study your own history before nosing into ours.