minnix to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareumami_wasabilinkfedilink7•11 months agoThey absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish8•11 months agoSome of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
minus-square@Deckweiss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•11 months agohttps://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
minus-square@helenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilink2•11 months agoOr they just use one of the hundreds already written?
They absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
Ok then, what are these politicians smoking?
Some of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
That’s the point
https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content
This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
Or they just use one of the hundreds already written?