• Taco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s a lil extreme my guy

    Edit: what fuckin world do we live in, where someone says that a politician needs to be shot to death, and the controversial opinion is to not shoot someone? Am I crazy for thinking that killing trump wouldn’t solve anything? We shouldn’t give people a martyr. The best way to get rid of someone is by shaming them and forgetting them.

    • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      50
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Furthermore, 18 U.S.C § 2381, states that a person guilty of treason against the United States “shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

    • @lateraltwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      361 year ago

      When he says that on a fringe social media platform it’s “lil extreme”

      When Trump says that 5 thugs need to be put to death, who were found Innocent, it’s just an opinion everyone is allowed to.

      • Taco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Uh no, that’s also an extreme opinion. Death is always an extreme opinion, because there’s no way to change your mind. Death is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.

        • @1847953620@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          If you’re gonna be a naïve idealist, at least be an effective one and pick arguments where you’re not splitting hairs over hyperbole on niche social media, much less hyperbole directed at a world-class factory of inflammatory hyperbole who has 0 chance of being executed by the government.

          • Taco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I will not entertain the concept of normalizing extremist hyperbole, as normalizing extremes tends to make them normal.

              • Taco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                There is a difference between starting conflict, and defending yourself. Assassination is not a defense

              • Taco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -71 year ago

                Nah I think we should do that to you, considering you’re ok with stuff like that

                • @1847953620@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  🤣 Hey, remember how Trump separated immigrant children from their mothers, some of whom we lost record of and have no idea if they’ve been reunited? Remember the physical abuse of immigrants he internally promoted? Remember his pandering to the Klan and neo-nazis and adjacent white nationalist organizations? Remember all the covid deaths he caused with his validating and spreading of lies? His insurrection attempt? Divulging of military strategic information? Don’t you think that tips the scales a little bit? All it took was a little bit of pushback to get you to flip on your “never joke about violence” stance. I’ve never done any of those things. You should re-evaluate your priorities. Unless this is really the hill you want to “die” (😱) on.

                  • Taco
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    A lil pushback? Flip? No, I’ve always been anti-violence. Killing people only results in more graves. War doesn’t solve anything. Sometimes you need to stand up in defense, and that’s different, but starting the violence is never a good thing

      • Honestly, if Hitler had been killed on Aug 29 1939, the Nazis might have done a lot better than they did. I don’t think his generals would have marched into Russia the way he did.

    • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      To respond to your edit:

      Death as a punishment for treason would do a lot to stem the tide of treasonous fucks that are currently holding high positions in our political system.

      The time for leniency is OVER. And making a martyr out of a huge sack of shit is just fine- let more of those fucks step out of line and see what happens.

            • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not so stupid that I’d think that doing next to nothing is the proper way to deal with traitors to our country.

              It’s even in built into our laws that death be a possible punishment.

              But noooooo, better he remain in jail where he can continue to rile up his army of dipshits and continue destroying this country.

              And yes, jailing him still entitles him to martyrdom. At least if the fat fuck were bleeding out in the dirt- he’d shut the fuck up for a change.

        • wanderingmagus
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          If such was legal and in accordance with the Constitution of the United States of America, the military would stand ready to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and obey the orders of those appointed them. Our officers stand ready and willing to defend the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Domestic terrorists are terrorists, and there’s nothing we like better than to hunt terrorists and put warheads on foreheads.

          • @Pottsunami@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, good luck getting a court to convict that. There are multiple lawsuits. None of them are considering anything with the death penalty, nor should it. There is no legal precedence for it.

            Convicting Trump of the death penalty is more likely to result in a 2nd civil war than it is to make people fall in line. We tried bombing the taliban into falling in line for 20 years. How’d that go?

            • wanderingmagus
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              We’ll March to the Sea again - and back, and forth, and back, and forth, as long as it takes. We did it once, we can do it again.

    • @HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I think it is more towards the fear of him becoming re-elected and death – while indeed extreme – would prevent such an outcome.

      • Taco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Hm actually no. I’d prefer to not be a crazy person. Thanks for the offer tho. Enjoy your killing spree. I’ll watch it on the news later

    • @xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Not really. It’s in line with all US laws to ask for the death penalty

      18 U.S.C § 2381, states that a person guilty of treason against the United States “shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

      Considering the scope and impact of his crimes. It would be reasonable to ask for the maximum punishment.

    • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      He may be a politician but he’s also a criminal and I think that would be the punishment for his crimes not for being a politician. Although hes a pretty awful politician too lol that’s not a crime.

    • @MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Boy let me tell you something about our founding fathers… This man tried to destroy our democracy, he deserves to die. However, for the sake of our civilized society I would prefer to see him rot in jail until he dies in the most unglamorous way possible that way he can’t be made a martyr.