by quoting the same organization with two different names as though they are two different organizations, and using quotes that imply this is their current position even when it is not, you are misleading people. that’s dishonest.
It’s only an example out of a long list of examples. It would only be dishonest if they, or other dietary organisations, reached conclusions that don’t support what I’m saying. But that isn’t true. It’s just an example of what has been the consensus among dietary professionals for decades.
The only one being dishonest is you and you’re awfully quiet in providing examples or engaging with anything in any substantially relevant manner. Which is typical for fucking idiots like yourself.
i’m pointing out your dishonest representation of the AND’s position, and your dishonest representation of the ADA as a separate institution. i provided all the information anyone needs to see that you don’t care about the truth as long as you have a link that you think supports your position.
by quoting the same organization with two different names as though they are two different organizations, and using quotes that imply this is their current position even when it is not, you are misleading people. that’s dishonest.
It’s only an example out of a long list of examples. It would only be dishonest if they, or other dietary organisations, reached conclusions that don’t support what I’m saying. But that isn’t true. It’s just an example of what has been the consensus among dietary professionals for decades.
The only one being dishonest is you and you’re awfully quiet in providing examples or engaging with anything in any substantially relevant manner. Which is typical for fucking idiots like yourself.
The only one being dishonest is you
typical for fucking idiots
i’m pointing out your dishonest representation of the AND’s position, and your dishonest representation of the ADA as a separate institution. i provided all the information anyone needs to see that you don’t care about the truth as long as you have a link that you think supports your position.