• @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -41 year ago

    So a photo staged after the event for the news report is your evidence he was blocking the sidewalk before the newsworthy event was happening.

    No.

    The photo shows the gear he blocked the sidewalk with. I’ll note that it’s not a typical tripod, but a much larger one that has a considerable footprint.

    The report itself, going by the testimony of the accused, is the evidence. The ticket with the admitted infraction further bolsters this evidence.

    What more do you want? What exactly are you in denial about?

      • @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Firstly, why are you taking things so personally?

        To the evidence, it’s literally all over the article, from the title even!

        P.E.I. photographer handcuffed, fined after taking pictures of Quebec City’s iconic Château Frontenac

        John Morris, a professional photographer from P.E.I., said he was trying to get the perfect shot of the iconic hotel when police approached him.

        A professional photographer from Charlottetown, P.E.I., has been fined $230 for “loitering” while he was taking pictures of Quebec City’s iconic Château Frontenac hotel.

        I’m not a professional photographer, but it would seem that someone in the process of taking photos, would probably have to have their equipment out. Perhaps even the equipment that he showed off for that photo in the same article. 😀

        You’re just mad for no reason. Relax.

          • @Smk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            An asshole to whom ?? He is explaining his opinion with facts from the article. The only assholes here are the one calling him an asshole. Calm down dawg. What’s your problem ?