• @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As someone who has actually studied political science, they absolutely do not know their history well lmao. They are (shitty) Orthodox Marxists and react quite strongly to being shown anything outside of that 150 year old bubble.

    They know a few core historical anecdotes that MLs cling to. But their knowledge breaks down extremely quickly when you try to reduce political science and statecraft to academic first principles, even when those principles intersect strongly with their ML orthodoxy.

    They are campists. They form their philosophy around relitigating cold war drama more than anything to do with actual socialism.

    • Historical_General
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What would you have them read to remedy this?

      And to take a current event as a litmus test since I don’t know you or your bias, do you condemn Israel’s racism, zionist ideology and their war crimes etc?

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So many things. But I’d start with The Ethics of Ambiguity to temper the autocratic revolution fetish.

          • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I’m not sure why you believe I owe you a litmus test.

            There is no right answer to the Israel situation, other than secular unification. You will not find me mounting a vocal defense of any theocracy or ethnostate.

            • Historical_General
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -31 year ago

              Well, you’re not claiming to the arbiter of truth here are you? Hence you have a bias, and as a layman I’d benefit from knowing it.

              I appreciate the answer regardless.