@morrowind@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down14cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.com@morrowind@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-square@morrowind@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilink10•1 year agoThat startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
minus-squareProtonBadgerlinkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoYes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
minus-squareChewylinkfedilink3•1 year agoYes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
minus-square@piexil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoIt’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O
That startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
Yes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
Yes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
It’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O
Very much so.