• federalreverse-old
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    At this point, the number of cars is about as disconnected from human progress as the consumption of animal products is. Much like we could easily remove the majority of animal product consumption, we could also remove the majority of cars and car miles.

    • lalo
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Being vegan requires only to change your buying choices. What your’e suggesting requires one to plant/locally source everything you consume, work close to your home, and completely change your means of transportation.

      Veganism is about not exploiting animals as practicable and possible. Which one do you recognize is practicable and possible for most humans?

      • federalreverse-old
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am saying reduce the number of cars, but not to zero. I’d guess that in developed nations, maybe 20% or 30% of cars are actually needed (obviously depending on the country and the local level of car use). Similarly, some percentage of animal products is actually useful even in developed nations (for now), e.g. for pregnant women or people with weird allergies.

        And of course, society needs to support lifestyle choices for them to be viable. That’s the same for veganism and a life without a car.

        • lalo
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I believe we should tackle the problems we can solve right now, if you can stop using cars and source locally, that’s great.

          Most of us can already change to a vegan lifestyle and stop contributing to intentionally killing animals that don’t want to die. Once most people get onboard with that, then we should address accidental deaths.

        • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -41 year ago

          Using fur instead of most plastic fabrics is the environmental choice. As an environmentalist, Fur/Leather are the best choices for clothing.