@SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agohey - trying to switch from Chrome to Firefox, what are your recommended extensions and/or quality of life addins, etc?message-square140fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1298arrow-down1message-squarehey - trying to switch from Chrome to Firefox, what are your recommended extensions and/or quality of life addins, etc?@SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square140fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@datavoid@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoIn my testing, dark reader made sites load much slower. Anyone else notice this?
minus-squareAphoticDevlinkfedilink2•1 year agoDark Reader is entirely client side, so it shouldn’t affect load times.
minus-square@Zpiritual@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•1 year agoRender times may increase significantly though depending on cpu((/gpu?).
minus-squareAphoticDevlinkfedilink2•1 year agoYes, I suppose if their computer is a decade or two old, it might have an impact on their render times.
minus-square@sock@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoit can make my google drive stuff take a couple extra seconds to realize whats happening
minus-squareVengefu1 TunalinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThis is my experience as well. Noticable slowdown after installing it. But IMO, it’s still worth it.
In my testing, dark reader made sites load much slower. Anyone else notice this?
Dark Reader is entirely client side, so it shouldn’t affect load times.
Render times may increase significantly though depending on cpu((/gpu?).
Yes, I suppose if their computer is a decade or two old, it might have an impact on their render times.
it can make my google drive stuff take a couple extra seconds to realize whats happening
Nope, still fast on my machines
This is my experience as well. Noticable slowdown after installing it. But IMO, it’s still worth it.