TLDR: XFCE and Cinnamon devs are begging beginning to work on Wayland support.

  • @hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good. X11 has not been properly maintained and shouldn’t be the default for any distro. (Xorg, whatever.)

    • @PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      -151 year ago

      At least the Mint devs are being realistic on the time span needed for Wayland to have a chance at working for everyone, unlike Fedora, KDE, and Gnome that are jumping the gun.

          • Pasta Dental
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Since we’re going with anecdotal evidence, I’ve been using Wayland daily for over a year and haven’t had any issues related to it

            • @Magickmaster@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              -51 year ago

              While maybe sometimes buggy, at least things run. I’m all for modernization, but if there are compatibility problems with recent software, I’m not OK with it being declared “the better, mature standard thing everybody should now use”.

      • Baut [she/her] auf.
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wayland works pretty well, especially on GNOME. It’s good they did the jump, X11 poses unacceptable security risks for the current time.

      • @merthyr1831@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Cinnamon and XFCE are outliers in that they try to be super stable, “complete” desktops, compared to GNOME and KDE that try to be bleeding edge and packed with new and changing features.

        Benefits to both, but I can respect why Cinnamon and XFCE have been slow to adopt Wayland (to a fault, many would argue)