• @RaptorMother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Tbh, the game’s great. I’ve literally see someone compare playing a city managment game at 30fps to a slideshow.

    Does it run well? No. Is it a disaster? Also no. Is every single other aspect of the simulation better than cs1? Absolutely yes. Most of the reviews are by far exaggerated

    • English Mobster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I mean, there are some nits I can pick.

      Places don’t feel as alive as they did in the original. The original was still deeply flawed, mind - but this goes even further than that.

      A great example - when there was a firetruck putting out a fire in the original, you could see little dudes squirting water. CS2 doesn’t even have guys come out; the fire just magically goes away. Multiply this by… everything.

      There’s no bikes (at least as far as I can tell), and the pedestrian path tooling seems to be a huge step back (the only dedicated pedestrian path I can find is technically considered a 2-lane road, but it doesn’t allow cars).

      The music has these cute little segments inbetween. But there’s only like… 5 of them. Once you hear all 5, you’ve heard everything and they start to grate. The other 2 “radio stations” don’t have the NPR segments, but they do have “ads”… and by “ads” they mean exactly 1 ad that you hear every time for “Spaz Electronics”. You can turn the ads off but I’d expect more than just a single one.

      Everything overreacts to anything you build. If you upgrade a road, it technically disconnects power + water + sewage for a hot second. Then you get a bunch of spam about “I don’t have any power!” blah blah even though the game was paused and they absolutely had power.

      It’s really hard to see what trips Cims are taking. The original let you see the paths Cims took throughout your city, which let you make informed decisions around public transport. Now you can just see… how much traffic there is? Which doesn’t tell you anything about where Cims are going, just where you have bottlenecks. It very much encourages a “just 1 more lane, bro” kind of thinking.

      Not having a wide variety of public transport options is a bummer. It feels like they left some stuff out for a future DLC (e.g. monorails).

      There’s no light shining from the camera at nighttime, so it can get actually literally pitch black at night. Like “turn off the day/night cycle because this is unplayable” levels of dark. A subtle light coming from the camera when not in photo mode would’ve done wonders.

      The zoning information is really hard to read. I can’t tell what areas I have zoned with something else because it colors areas from other zones as white and unzoned areas as clear… on a mostly white background. It’s really really hard to tell at-a-glance what needs to still be zoned in some cases.

      The more I play it, the more it feels like CS1 is the sequel and CS2 is the original. There’s just so much that’s not done as well or that’s simply not there. The stuff they added is cool, sure… but like, I wish it was additive on top of what we had before, and not “back at square one”. It just makes me want to play the original.

      • @SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Can you imagine how much slower the game would have been with bicycles, individual paths and subtle light coming from the camera at night? These were probably performance decisions, not gameplay (though it’s possible it was rushed and they cut out non essentials for release).

    • @Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, it does have infinite less content, because it still lacks of the flood of DLCs, so it can’t be better in that not so unimportant regard.

      It’s just not finished yet, and I have no problem waiting for a year or two, you don’t have to defend them.

      • @nixcamic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To me it’s win win. I can wait for it to go on sale and by then it will actually run on my PC. If it was finished on day one I’d be really tempted to buy it full price.

        • @Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          True, these companies do us patient gamers a solid one.

          It’s been easy to transition to one when the releases are majorly hot garbage.

    • Lord Wiggle
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I have no issue playing. It runs smooth. I did encounter several bugs though. But that’s usual for games released nowadays. I hope those get patched soon. Although I’m happy it works for me, I’m sad to see so many people have much worse experiences. Game developers aren’t what they used to be. Except Larian Studios, they are great.

    • @doktorseven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      The original ran like shit too and its UI was garbage compared to any SimCity. Never understood the love for that game. SC3KU was the peak of city sim games.

      • @TGTX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        When Interplay decided that Sim City needed goofy, over-the-top FMVs on a CD-ROM…I think that was peak Sim City. As a kid, I was disappointed 2k and 3k didn’t have professional, career-oriented adults yelling at you for your incompetence in FMV.

        • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I hadn’t realised till just now, but I do miss SC’s bullying and harassment. I don’t unleash disasters near as much nowdays, and I wonder if that’s part of why. I don’t have department heads and politicians openly disappointed in me all the time.

          The small masochist in me is trying to convince me to ask for that feature back.