• @intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      The ability to lock stolen phones should be under the control of its owner. Keeping it under OEM is just asking for that capability to be abused and misused against the wishes of the owner.

      • @sarmale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        How do you keep that only to the owner without proprietary software Should only the owner have a private key? And how would it be set to be the correct one in the first place?

        • @intrepid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I don’t understand the requirement for a proprietary software for this. Meanwhile, boot chain verification exists already. And there is no reason why it can’t be under the control of the user - with a user-supplied private key.

          • @sarmale@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Could you explain? I dont understant very well, from what I thought free software should be able to be replaced by anything

            • @intrepid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Free software should be able to be replaced by anything - by the owner. There is no technical reason the device can’t still be locked to prevent modification by someone else. There are already free software that allows you (the owner) to remotely screen-lock the device.

    • CaptainBasculin
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Phones smuggled from different countries where they are cheaper. Has the possibility to include stolen phones due to its nature

    • @BearWolf
      link
      11 year ago

      Wow way to be racist. It’s just dey cultcha.

      • @glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Lol is this a joke? Stolen phones are everywhere. I haven’t watched the video because it should be a blog post though.