@bathalumang_peppa@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoApple’s “carbon neutral” claims are facing increased scrutinyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1420arrow-down110cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1410arrow-down1external-linkApple’s “carbon neutral” claims are facing increased scrutinyarstechnica.com@bathalumang_peppa@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-square@Crampon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoApple could use Coca Cola’s defence on the vitamin water lawsuit. “no consumer could reasonably be misled into thinking vitaminwater was a healthy beverage.” No reasonable customer should believe their products is carbon neutral. Unless the product is fucking logs found in the woods. Great thing we actually have organizations to shit down this shenanigans.
minus-squareHeartyBeastlinkfedilink5•1 year agoIf Apple actually invested in some new offshore windfarms and/or solar farms to offset., I think that’s reasonable. Buying credits from some other outfit - not so much.
Apple could use Coca Cola’s defence on the vitamin water lawsuit.
“no consumer could reasonably be misled into thinking vitaminwater was a healthy beverage.”
No reasonable customer should believe their products is carbon neutral.
Unless the product is fucking logs found in the woods.
Great thing we actually have organizations to shit down this shenanigans.
If Apple actually invested in some new offshore windfarms and/or solar farms to offset., I think that’s reasonable. Buying credits from some other outfit - not so much.