On Friday, the White House rolled out its proposed $105 billion bill to arm Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. The legislation also includes funding for the border and humanitarian assistance. US officials say over $50 billion will go to American weapons manufacturers. The Biden administration is proposing a massive aid package as it has struggled to … Continue reading "White House Seeks $105 Billion To Arm Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan"
Earth is still on track to be completely uninhabitable by the end of the century but hey, Dems pay lip service to climate change so kudos to them!
dishonest cherry picking
What part of this image is dishonest? Be specific. You clearly didn’t even bother to look very closely at it, since you failed to notice how your “yeah well what about environmental issues ” rebuttal had already been directly addressed by the very diagram you were responding to.
Lol at the smuglord image after posting a sophomoric oversimplified venn diagram while tapping it. You win biggest projection of the day.
But no it doesn’t actually address it, it mentions climate change, which is one aspect, and still not correct.
But that being said, just last year the Dems passed the inflation reduction act which was the most significant bill in us history to address climate change.
But whatever I’m sure is the republicans would have done the same thing.
Lol at the smuglord image after posting a sophomoric oversimplified venn diagram while tapping it. You win biggest projection of the day.
Then how about actually addressing the fucking points? If it’s such a “sophomoric oversimplified venn diagram” as you claim, then explain to the class how it’s sophomoric and oversimplified. Engage with the content and stop being such a coward.
But that being said, just last year the Dems passed the inflation reduction act
Then how about actually addressing the fucking points?
I’ve never said nor suggested that there was nothing they agree on. While I could quibble about most of “they are the same” points in the middle, and strongly disagree with others, it’s really besides the point. There are things on which they are drastically different.
then explain to the class how it’s sophomoric and oversimplified.
I literally did, or debunked it as cherry-picked garbage, and you accused me of being a smuglord for doing so. Am I supposed to address every little point on it? Or can I just demonstrate how it is cherry-picked garbage?
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 2005 levels aka too little too late.
I tend to agree. But all we can do is move forward at this point. But that doesn’t change the fact that with republicans we would do nothing, if not just make policy to make it even worse.
You say that like it’s a high bar.
No, I did not. You just need to be dismissive of it because it negates your worldview.
At least the Republicans are up front about how awful they are and don’t pretend to help by pissing on us as they throw more fuel on the fire.
Ah, so we agree both sides are not the same. Good on you for coming around. Although, in a kind of weird way. But, this kind of further proves a belief of mine that “muh both sides” is just an attempt to excuse bad behavior by Republicans so people can justify still voting for them… . and maybe I can add now “despite openly being against their interests.”
There are things on which they are drastically different.
Things which Democrats do little to nothing about. Remind me how abortion rights are going, again?
Am I supposed to address every little point on it?
I’m just asking you to back up the arguments you made, buddy. You insisted the entire diagram I provided was “dishonest” “cherry picking” and “sophomoric” and all I want is for you to do is explain exactly how, which you refuse to do aside from going on about climate change, one point among many that were presented.
But that doesn’t change the fact that with republicans we would do nothing.
So “doing nothing” and “doing a tiny bit of something then immediately negating it with something worse” are totally different things that we need to respect, got it.
Ah, so we agree both sides are not the same
“Both parties are the same” means “both parties only serve capital.” This isn’t a very complex point and you only make yourself look foolish by failing to grasp it.
Things which Democrats do little to nothing about. Remind me how are abortion rights going, again?
In blue states where they have significant control, perfectly fine. At the federal level where Republicans packed the court so they could take away the rights of individuals, and in Republican controlled states, not so much. Democrats can’t really do much when Republicans block appointments to the SCOTUS because “it’s an election year”, then turn around and contradict themselves and appoint a SCOTUS during an election year. And, again, they can’t do much when they have a slim majority, and things can be blocked by a filibuster or a handful of democrats dissenting from the party.
which you refuse to do aside from going on about climate change
And, again, this venn diagram you’ve probably been (smugly) pulling out and tapping every time someone challenges on the BS is now outdates, considering democrats just passed a significant climate bill (even if it isn’t enough). No longer can one claim they are doing nothing at the federal level but paying lip service.
So “doing nothing” and “doing a tiny bit of something then immediately negating it with something worse” are totally different things that we need to respect, got it.
This is generally how our government works, we do things incrementally. It’s kind of designed that way, for better or for worse. In this case worse. But yes, moving in the right direction is much better and different than moving in the wrong direction, even if it is only incremental.
“This isn’t a very complex point and you only make yourself look foolish by failing to grasp it.
So, if it isn’t complex, why obfuscate the point that they are only the same on a subset of things and ignore all the important ways they are different? Seems rather dishonest to me.
Democrats can’t really do much when Republicans block appointments to the SCOTUS because “it’s an election year”, then turn around and contradict themselves and appoint a SCOTUS during an election year. And, again, they can’t do much when they have a slim majority, and things can be blocked by a filibuster or a handful of democrats dissenting from the party.
Dems had multiple opportunities in the nearly 50 years Roe was active where they had control of both chambers of congress and the presidency, in which they could have easily enshrined abortion rights into law. Likewise for abolishing the filibuster. Why haven’t they?
Again, I said the environment, not just Climate change
Again, the diagram addresses far more than climate change/the environment. You said the entire diagram was “dishonest cherry picking,” yet here you are dishonestly cherry picking one small point while ignoring everything else presented on the image.
democrats just passed a significant climate bill (even if it isn’t enough). No longer can one claim they are doing nothing at the federal level but paying lip service.
Why should anyone bother responding to you if you’re going to ignore everything they say and just repeat the same points over and over again after they’ve been rebutted? Scroll up and read my other comments again, I’m not repeating myself.
why obfuscate the point that they are only the same on a subset of things and ignore all the important ways they are different
So all the points in the middle of the diagram just aren’t important? The fact that both parties only serve capital doesn’t matter to you? Both parties rubber stamping endless defense budget increases while healthcare crumbles is insignificant? Both parties providing full, unconditional support and funding to a genocidal apartheid state doesn’t matter because the bloo team did a single bill promising to reduce carbon emissions by a little bit (then completely negated it by opening up more oil drilling)?
In what important ways have they actually made a difference (and don’t fucking go on about “but the environment” again unless you have something new to say that hasn’t already been rebutted)?
At the federal level where Republicans packed the court
Republicans did not pack the court, they could get away with lower-level chicanery. If the Dens really cared or weren’t cowards, they might consider actually packing the court.
They are trying to demonstrate that Democrats don’t care about the environment, which is why they pointed to new oil drilling and then go on to say “not to mention” about the war. Maybe you are right, and they didn’t mean to link it to the Dems, but it pretty clearly did.
The point of all of this is bipartisan support of terrible shit, you just fell back into your habit of looking at things in terms of arguing against Republicans.
Aren’t Democrats currently arming one side of the Russo Ukrainian conflict and arming the Israeli occupation? And didn’t those same Democrats increase military funding?
In that case *taps sign*
Insta-debunk because when it comes to environmental issues, they are very different and this only lists abortion as a difference.
Of course, it comes as no surprise that “muh both sides”-ers base their arguments on dishonest cherry picking.
Earth is still on track to be completely uninhabitable by the end of the century but hey, Dems pay lip service to climate change so kudos to them!
What part of this image is dishonest? Be specific. You clearly didn’t even bother to look very closely at it, since you failed to notice how your “yeah well what about environmental issues
” rebuttal had already been directly addressed by the very diagram you were responding to.
Lol at the smuglord image after posting a sophomoric oversimplified venn diagram while tapping it. You win biggest projection of the day.
But no it doesn’t actually address it, it mentions climate change, which is one aspect, and still not correct.
But that being said, just last year the Dems passed the inflation reduction act which was the most significant bill in us history to address climate change.
But whatever I’m sure is the republicans would have done the same thing.
Then how about actually addressing the fucking points? If it’s such a “sophomoric oversimplified venn diagram” as you claim, then explain to the class how it’s sophomoric and oversimplified. Engage with the content and stop being such a coward.
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 2005 levels aka too little too late. And Biden opened up a bunch of offshore drilling negating any climate impact that bill might have had. Great job, Democrats.
You say that like it’s a high bar.
At least the Republicans are up front about how awful they are and don’t pretend to help by pissing on us as they throw more fuel on the fire.
I’ve never said nor suggested that there was nothing they agree on. While I could quibble about most of “they are the same” points in the middle, and strongly disagree with others, it’s really besides the point. There are things on which they are drastically different.
I literally did, or debunked it as cherry-picked garbage, and you accused me of being a smuglord for doing so. Am I supposed to address every little point on it? Or can I just demonstrate how it is cherry-picked garbage?
I tend to agree. But all we can do is move forward at this point. But that doesn’t change the fact that with republicans we would do nothing, if not just make policy to make it even worse.
No, I did not. You just need to be dismissive of it because it negates your worldview.
Ah, so we agree both sides are not the same. Good on you for coming around. Although, in a kind of weird way. But, this kind of further proves a belief of mine that “muh both sides” is just an attempt to excuse bad behavior by Republicans so people can justify still voting for them… . and maybe I can add now “despite openly being against their interests.”
Things which Democrats do little to nothing about. Remind me how abortion rights are going, again?
I’m just asking you to back up the arguments you made, buddy. You insisted the entire diagram I provided was “dishonest” “cherry picking” and “sophomoric” and all I want is for you to do is explain exactly how, which you refuse to do aside from going on about climate change, one point among many that were presented.
So “doing nothing” and “doing a tiny bit of something then immediately negating it with something worse” are totally different things that we need to respect, got it.
“Both parties are the same” means “both parties only serve capital.” This isn’t a very complex point and you only make yourself look foolish by failing to grasp it.
In blue states where they have significant control, perfectly fine. At the federal level where Republicans packed the court so they could take away the rights of individuals, and in Republican controlled states, not so much. Democrats can’t really do much when Republicans block appointments to the SCOTUS because “it’s an election year”, then turn around and contradict themselves and appoint a SCOTUS during an election year. And, again, they can’t do much when they have a slim majority, and things can be blocked by a filibuster or a handful of democrats dissenting from the party.
Again, I said the environment, not just Climate change. Go look at environment protections in blue states vs red states.
And, again, this venn diagram you’ve probably been (smugly) pulling out and tapping every time someone challenges on the BS is now outdates, considering democrats just passed a significant climate bill (even if it isn’t enough). No longer can one claim they are doing nothing at the federal level but paying lip service.
This is generally how our government works, we do things incrementally. It’s kind of designed that way, for better or for worse. In this case worse. But yes, moving in the right direction is much better and different than moving in the wrong direction, even if it is only incremental.
So, if it isn’t complex, why obfuscate the point that they are only the same on a subset of things and ignore all the important ways they are different? Seems rather dishonest to me.
Dems had multiple opportunities in the nearly 50 years Roe was active where they had control of both chambers of congress and the presidency, in which they could have easily enshrined abortion rights into law. Likewise for abolishing the filibuster. Why haven’t they?
Again, the diagram addresses far more than climate change/the environment. You said the entire diagram was “dishonest cherry picking,” yet here you are dishonestly cherry picking one small point while ignoring everything else presented on the image.
So all the points in the middle of the diagram just aren’t important? The fact that both parties only serve capital doesn’t matter to you? Both parties rubber stamping endless defense budget increases while healthcare crumbles is insignificant? Both parties providing full, unconditional support and funding to a genocidal apartheid state doesn’t matter because the bloo team did a single bill promising to reduce carbon emissions by a little bit (then completely negated it by opening up more oil drilling)?
In what important ways have they actually made a difference (and don’t fucking go on about “but the environment” again unless you have something new to say that hasn’t already been rebutted)?
Republicans did not pack the court, they could get away with lower-level chicanery. If the Dens really cared or weren’t cowards, they might consider actually packing the court.
This administration has opened up a shitload of new oil drilling, weird lanyard nerds coping
Not to mention the environmental impact of all these new wars
Lol thanks for proving my point that it’s a right wing talking pointing by implicitly blaming the wars on democrats.
This comment thread is about the bipartisan support for the wars. How is that blaming them on democrats?
They are trying to demonstrate that Democrats don’t care about the environment, which is why they pointed to new oil drilling and then go on to say “not to mention” about the war. Maybe you are right, and they didn’t mean to link it to the Dems, but it pretty clearly did.
My man which party’s administration has given 400 quantillion dollars to Ukraine to prolong it’s dumb war
The point of all of this is bipartisan support of terrible shit, you just fell back into your habit of looking at things in terms of arguing against Republicans.
Aren’t Democrats currently arming one side of the Russo Ukrainian conflict and arming the Israeli occupation? And didn’t those same Democrats increase military funding?