• @angrymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Netanyahu is not like Churchill against the nazis, Hammas is like a bunch of Kids with sticks against Israel Army

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      -111 months ago

      There still should be a plan and a leader responsible for its implementation. Hamas maybe a bunch of kids with sticks, but Israeli Army is not, and potential for screwup is high.

        • @Corran1138@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          There’s multiple levels so the answer is “sort of.” Very generally, the Minister of Defense (or equivalent) has a national defense council that will have heads of armed forces and maybe a few senior civilian members. The council creates the overall battle plan with specific generals or admirals creating plans for specific battles or campaigns that conform to the overarching goals set by the defense council. The Prime Minister has a cabinet. The cabinet will receive info from the defense council. Intelligence agencies and departments involved with any economic warfare. The PM and cabinet can give direction to individual councils and departments to coordinate the overarching strategy of the entire country. The defense council will then adjust plans based on Cabinet’s directives. The PM is probably given detailed briefings of battlefield progress and aims for the military for the short-, medium-, and long-term for the conflict and can veto specific plans. But the PM won’t help to plan attacks or modify those plans usually. That’s the purview of generals and admirals.

      • @angrymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        You maybe right, but I just can’t see any big risk for Israel here besides lose their institutions to an autocratic leader.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          -211 months ago

          As I said, potential for screwup is high. But the leader does not has to be Netanyahu.