Shortly before 7 p.m. Tuesday, a volley of rockets lit up the darkened sky over Gaza. Videos analyzed by The Associated Press show one veering off course, breaking up in the air before crashing to the ground.

Seconds later, the videos show a large explosion in the same area – the site of Gaza’s al-Ahli Arab Hospital.

Who is to blame for the fiery explosion has set off intense debate and finger pointing between the Israeli government and Palestinian militants, further escalating tensions in their two week-long war.

  • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Instead of a lecture about why I should accept you on faith why not produce the contemporary records?

    The sources that do exist were shortly after Jesus’ life

    Oh like Paul who didn’t see anything? Oh like the Mark Gospel written fifty years later, with no sources, on a different continent filled up with copy and pasted from Elijah? Oh you mean like Josephus (50 years after the supposed events) with two passages one a forgery and the other possibly talking about someone else? Oh you mean Tacticus who was a century later and related hearsay without consulting a single Roman record?

    How about everyone else, how about the hundreds of letters we have from that area and time period that never once mention any of the events? How about people documenting Messiah figures during the first century not seeing anyone? How about the total lack of records of Nazareth even existing in that century, the entire Joseph family missing from records, all relics missing, the tomb missing, the trial records missing?

    Now show me a CONTEMPORARY record not what some Muslim said in Saudi Arabia 9 centuries later.

    • @slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I did. It seems your definition of “contemporary” is different from mine.

      Whatever. No point in arguing with the atheist circlejerk; it’s sad how the good points you have get ruined by your inability to do research and understand context.

      • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Nope. Contemporary is not 90 years later by any definition. Me writing an article this week about fashion trends of 1923 should not be titled “contemporary fall fashion”.