WASHINGTON, Oct 20 (Reuters) - The United States on Friday released a U.S. intelligence assessment sent to more than 100 countries that found Moscow is using spies, social media and Russian state-run media to erode public faith in the integrity of democratic elections worldwide.

“This is a global phenomenon,” said the assessment. “Our information indicates that senior Russian government officials, including the Kremlin, see value in this type of influence operation and perceive it to be effective.”

A senior State Department official, briefing reporters on condition of anonymity, said that Russia was encouraged to intensify its election influence operations by its success in amplifying disinformation about the 2020 U.S. election and the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • spaceghotiOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    It’s pointing out that we aren’t immune to Russian propaganda, that it’s clear that the Russians have found success in meddling in our elections and your own comment was a clear demonstration of that fact. No, it doesn’t touch on our own interference but that’s a moot point here. Unless you have evidence that we are currently meddling in foreign elections, and even then you would need to demonstrate that our goal is to undermine democracy around the world as the Kremlin is doing.

    But somehow I suspect you’ll continue to sling mud without providing anything concrete to back up your assertions.

    • Decoy321
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      The whataboutism is irrelevant either way. Proving that a different country is doing terrible things does not absolve the original country from doing terrible things.

      Don’t bother engaging with the apologist, they’re not conversing in good faith.

    • jimmydoreisalefty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -101 year ago

      Journalists and leaks have shown how we influence and overthrow democratic elections in other countries.

      “When Exposing a Crime is Treated as Committing a Crime, You Are Ruled By Criminals.”

      • spaceghotiOP
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        So as predicted, nothing concrete. Thank you for this pointless exercise.

        • jimmydoreisalefty
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -61 year ago

          I do not think anything I post will change your mind.

          It is better for you to look it up and see for yourself, you will learn more or just keep thinking the same.

          Thank you for this small talk.

          • spaceghotiOP
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            It is notable on how you didn’t try, even after I clarified what I was looking for. Good work, Komrade.

            • jimmydoreisalefty
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -61 year ago

              I pointed out my view and you did as well.

              If we want to learn more of each side the internet can help.

              Any yt person you like or journalist you recommend?

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Chelsea Manning, Ed Snowden, Assange, Kiriouk.

        No one really remembers Chris Hedges or Greg Palast anymore, either.

        • jimmydoreisalefty
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 year ago

          Thanks for post!

          I know Chris Hedges was involved with The Real News Network (on YT).

          Another one is Richard Wolff, he may be with Democracy At Work (on YT).

          They used to be more active with talks in the media, they do go on independent yt shows once in a while.

          Thanks for Greg Palast, I do not recall hearing of him!

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            You’re welcome. He introduced me to the term “vulture capitalism.”