• @Navy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Or, if we’re changing cities already we could make more accessible homes and public transit. If someone in a wheelchair can’t get onto a train you’ve made the train wrong.

      • @Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I traveled up and down the East Coast with my dad when he was in a wheelchair. Every city was a little different but Amtrak has made their trains this way. A special ramp is needed, which has to be fetched by someone. Baltimore was the worst about it, but they did get us on just fine, and kicked a guy out of the handicapped starting. New York City was incredible. Dude hung out with us until our train showed up and made sure we got on and situated before regular boarding started. Though I think he had dealt with something similar personal and took it upon himself. DC was at about the level you’d expect and was pretty pleasant.

        • @Navy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Great to hear, that is actually a lot better than I would have expected. It would still be ideal if you could use it as easily as someone not using a wheelchair but we do have to live in the real world and accommodating everyone is complicated and expensive.

      • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Man. There’s a Korean drama on Netflix… I think it was All of Us Are Dead. The apartment building had a bodega-like grocery either on the first floor or connected to it. If we’re going to redesign, can it be like that, maybe?

        • @Navy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Absolutely it could be like that, mixed use buildings are something we really lack in North America and are the lifeblood of a city

    • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      And that really worries me. The government should offer free options for people like that. Uber Eats and Instacart exploits the hell out of people like that.

        • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          No one said it was.

          See, I knew one of you motherfuckers was going to come in here and make it obvious you just don’t care about the actual facts, you’ve already made up your minds and seek to make up everyone else’s minds for them.

          Maybe instead of treating every single discussion of anything like an epic shitfight, you all should just pool your money together, buy your own land, incorporate it as a separate county, and build your own walkable cities and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

            • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because you all are doing nothing but demonstrating for us once again the negativity and childish banality of the human condition, and I’m tired of it.

              The immaturity, the short-sightedness, the complete lack of empathy or consideration for anyone who disagrees with you – you all are attacking people, not just me, who are calling out walkable cities for being unviable for disabled people. One stupid motherfucker here even suggested people like that use delivery services to get their groceries instead of being able to drive, knowing Instacart and Uber Eats exploits the disabled and isn’t available everywhere. No consideration that it’s unfair for disabled people who can’t walk far regardless. No consideration that what you want isn’t completely viable because different people with different needs exist, nothing.

              Y’all are just angry other people are opposing you because you think us chucklefucks online disagreeing with you is a barrier to what you want and I’m tired of putting up with it.

              So until you change, I’m going to be angry at you, and if you don’t like me being angry at you for your own behavior, that’s a you problem. I don’t need you to listen to me or even like me, but you apparently need my approval for your stupid policies and ill-thought-out ideas, and therefore you need me a whole lot more than I need you. The only one hurt by my anger is you. You’re the one complaining about it.

              You’re fucking political parasites and I’m tired of it.

              Now let’s watch your dumb ass prove my point and do nothing but address my anger and my emotions while not addressing the needs of the disabled people who would be thrown under the bus with car bans at all. 🙄

              • @gayhitler420@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Busses here have better accessibility than cars.

                There are people who need more aid than the busses are equipped for and the bus line runs specially equipped shuttles out to them on request at no cost (back when the busses had fares it cost the same as a bus ride).

                • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  71 year ago

                  It’s not that way in most other cities on the planet and you and I both know this.

                  And it doesn’t address one of the many serious problems with car bans – denying the disabled the right to travel on their own terms and not the bus services.

                  What happens when they cut routes or service?

                  Or refuse service for political reasons like during the lockdowns?

                  Or otherwise dictate when and where you get rides, or who can go with you, or how you travel, or how much stuff you can bring with you?

                  Or if the service becomes overwhelmed and they simply can’t provide rides to everybody?

                  It’s terrible and fucked up to expect the disabled to put up with it just so the c/FuckCars chucklefucks can get rid of what they deem as eyesores.

                  • @gayhitler420@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -31 year ago

                    i don’t know how it is in most cities on the planet because i don’t live in them and haven’t looked into their public transit.

                    part of having a common good is defending and upholding it. usually when there’s a problem with the routes people show up and yell loud enough that something gets done. I don’t think they’ve cut a route and not replaced it with one that has more stops or split it into two that provide more coverage in like 20 years.

                    during covid here there were fewer busses running, but it was because of reduced ridership and they ran more on demand shuttles to make up the difference. they started installing big crazy air filters on the top of the busses too, so now you can’t even smell a fart on one.

                    when there’s more people than the route can handle you gotta wait, same as when there’s more traffic than the road can handle. here when that unexpectedly happens they redirect people to other routes when possible.

                    a lot of what youre talking about is disabled people getting equal access to what car drivers have, which is good when the disabled person lives in a place that expects everyone to have a car. if a place were to ban cars, expect people to use public transport and operate public transport with enough volume and coverage to replace them, it would be better for the disabled than expecting each individual disabled person to own a car with expensive modifications to accommodate them and become licensed to operate it or hire a driver or service in the case they cannot become licensed.

                    serving the disabled and elderly is what’s driven the expansion of bus routes and accessibility here. we don’t even have car bans and it’s a benefit for so many people!

              • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                Pot meet kettle lol. People are making actual arguments about how a walkable city is better for every class of person, not just one specific class, and you’re throwing them all out, without entertaining the thoughts at all, and with a fair bit of vitriol.

                Any situation where the average person doesn’t need any special equipment (a car) to get their things done is going to be better for everyone. As a off the top of the head example, when no one else NEEDS to drive, for instance, the people who do need to can more readily. Or they can utilize other, cheaper, specialized equipment, like powered wheelchairs more easily, because everything is within walking distance and the streets aren’t packed with people in cars.

                • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not what’s happening but thanks for showing the class you haven’t been paying attention at all.

                  You know, if all you invested a fifth of a third of a quarter of the energy you’re investing trying to get something over on me onto building these walkable cities you supposedly care about, we’d all be on Saturn by now.